Hearing some alpha about this coin, 850k mcap EP3gwdJ2n3zHHBkWXWfHkNRnpiz2tGbxw1HiW6r8pump Will post more when I find out more

Channel
Zach’s Degen Thoughts
@cryptozach_la
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,712subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002201360474 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptozach_la |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptozach_la |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 2,712 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 2,716 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 2,717 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 2,717 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
$MANIFEST is reversing heavy rn. Love to see it. Manifesting bull market soon 🤞🏼 All roads lead to $MANIFEST
Manifesting Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 Spent $49,452.26 (600.65
$50k buy on MANIFEST. People are bidding the bottom with size.... Bottom is in, higher soon.
Market absolutely garbage right now. So many KOL coins coming out sucking liquidity and everyone’s just going to get fucked in the end. $MANIFEST still a solid buy here and heavy support zone. They are launching apparently a prediction market of sorts, but manifesting style, and it’ll be lucrative to holders and users- so I can’t wait. Would be bullish too if they used fees for buybacks and burns
$MANIFEST holding $30m and getting listings on BloFin and Moonshot now. - Soon, more listings and more whales apeing the best culture coin there is in the market.
$SON at $1.5m-1m is a bid. Hearing they are about to go on a big marketing campaign and launch some cool new shit. Won't lie, the "Are ya winning son?" meme has always be hilarious to me especially when it involves trading and getting liquidated. Could be a solid runner. As always, DYOR and have fun in the meme game and do not risk what u cannot afford to lose. CA: ACpzkGJV3DDU8HXy8yjab7RL9qNmDGym2GwLkzNppump I go…
GG’s it’s been 1 month now since $MANIFEST call and he hit a 10x and maybe even a 12-15x if you DCAd Cheers to many more plays coming soon 🤝 Only looking for the best right now that’ll net 5x+
Ansem not even hard shilling yet and he reposting MANIFEST giveaways. Higher. Soon.
Time to fill the wick
GG’s officially up 10x on $MANIFEST you could’ve bought with size.
Gun to head- I think $BTC hits $65k soon just because the polymarket odds are so high. People will push this up to hit 65k and then reverse back down. I think you could get a solid short on $ETH and other weak alt coins as soon as BTC htis $65k, just market short whatever ETH is at. Will be doing this and monitoring for the 65k touch They did this exact same thing when BTC hit $60k. Polymarket odds were at 90%+ and…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptozach_la. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 142,881 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zach’s Degen Thoughts” (@cryptozach_la), 2,712 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptozach_la.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.