Channel
@cryptoxDaily1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002269811378 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoxDaily1 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoxDaily1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 50 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 56 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 60 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 60 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
14 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 57.1% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 14.3% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 INK Network Airdrope Distribution ( cpen network ) ⏳ You have time until 15 August to complete your KYC and Wallet Submission. 𝐑𝐄𝐆𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐊👇✨✨ https://www.cpen.io?r=fsadiss Referal code: fsadiss ⚠️ Members who do not complete KYC or submit a valid wallet before the deadline may miss their #INK distribution. 🎁 #INK Distribution will begin after 15 August. ⛽ When transferring or selling your INK tokens, …
Market update- The levels that I mentioned yesterday for Bitcoin have been playing out- The liquidity at $65.6k was tested, and this was the exact point of rejection. After 4hr acceptance below the Monday High we have seen a move towards $63.7k (Weekly Open). I said yesterday that $63.7k was my first level of interest for a reaction and, although it has not been tested completely cleanly, we have started to show st…
Market update- Bitcoin has been unable to break the resistance at $64.6k (Monday High) so far this weekend. I mentioned yesterday that any move lower and $63.6k (Weekly Open) was the key level to hold for bulls- this has been respected so far, but the reaction has not been great. This could be because of the usual lower weekend volume, so I will be watching to see how things change heading into the weekly close. If …
Market update- Yesterday Bitcoin rejected exactly from $64.6k (Monday High) to confirm the resistance as we expected. A push towards $66k is very possible, but only after a clean break of $64.6k. We can see the recent 4hr candles that the usual weekend sideways movement has begun. $64k is currently 4hr support, so it seems likely that $64k - $64.6k could be the range over the next 24 hours. Any move below $64k and b…
Market update : - Bitcoin gave a third rejection from the $64k resistance we have been watching over the past few days. This has led to a more aggressive move down and BTC is currently trying to hold on to the $62k level. I am more interested in a sweep of $61.2k (Monday Low) to see if another strong reaction is given from this area. If this does not hold, the $60.2k level I mentioned a number of days ago is still on…
💰$BTCUSDT | 4Hr Timeframe 🕯 Bitcoin has finally broken out of a long descending trendline and cleared the key resistance zone around $62k-$63k. If the price holds above this level as support, we can expect a strong bullish continuation toward $65k+.🚀 📌However, if this support fails to hold, we might see BTC drop back toward the $61k level.📉
Trading pair: APTUSDT - Chart analysis: The APT price is attempting to hold above the $0.62 level. If it succeeds, the uptrend will continue. - Entry: A long position can be opened near the $0.62 level. - Main Target: Liquidity is at the current high of $0.7150.
New signal
Market update Bitcoin is rejecting from the resistance , I have not shorted this area yet as it is quite common to see scam pumps over a 3-day holiday weekend. We can probably expect BTC to chop around between $62k and $63k over the next 24 hours before the volatility decides the next move. If this is a break of the $62.8k/$63k resistance then $64k - $64.8k is next. But if the rejection continues, then still inte…
Crypto Daily pinned « 💰 MEXC CRPTO & STOCK EXCHANGE WALLET💰 🔰Sign Up with a Referral code & Get an extra Free 20 $ ! For sign up ✅ REGISTRATION LINK : https://promote.mexc.co/r/UGNSGhUY8L ✅Option 2 🛍Download mexc app from playstore ➡️ click referal code & enter ( 1ama5…»
Bitcoin is still trading inside this range and holding above the key support zone. Every bounce is getting rejected below the descending trendline and the 200 MA, keeping the short-term trend bearish. As long as support holds, we could see another relief bounce. But a breakdown below this support would likely open the door for a bigger move to the downside. Keep an eye on this range. The next breakout could decide…
#BTC has successfully retested the broken triangle support line and got rejected. Sellers are still heavily in control, and the bearish momentum is picking up speed.🐻 We are now looking at a continuation drop toward the next key support levels. Keep an eye on $58,000 and $56,000 as the next targets.📌
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptoxDaily1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 631,002 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Daily” (@cryptoxDaily1), 50 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoxDaily1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.