Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CRYPTOSPACE

Channel

CRYPTOSPACE

@cryptowgrows

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

193subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001277929764
TypeChannel
Username@cryptowgrows
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptowgrows

Growth

193198195.57 August 2026 — 198 subscribers7 August 2026 — 198 subscribers15 August 2026 — 194 subscribers21 August 2026 — 193 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 192–199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 11:17193-1
15 Aug 2026, 07:05194-4
7 Aug 2026, 04:32198no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:20198first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
770.0%
👍220.0%
🔥110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC37 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

love how the opposite happened. Thus, confirmations are important

4 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Swept PDH. Weekends so not very ideal, but waiting for the candle to close below the marked region and then we can short.

1

29 Jun 2026, 07:09 UTC40 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtube.com/live/p1DuWWZr1ew?feature=share I am live here. Join if you can

24 Jun 2026, 13:25 UTC56 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

It's good only that this has been broken. Knew it will happen, as that's better in the longer run. For me, a run to 60k makes thing better'

24 Jun 2026, 04:06 UTC55 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

If it doesn't go any lower, then it leaves LIQ pool below the current range, which would either make the price come back down after 70k, or make the price action slower this whole month

20 Oct 2025, 08:46 UTC158 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Happy Diwali everyone. I am very unsure of the markets, thus I don’t know how many of you are doing well. But in a year from now, I’ll finally be free, have more time to put in trading and I’ll resume posting more often. I wish all your struggles to end as you plan them, and bear fruit as you wish for. Have a great Diwali. 🪔 May the good in you rise

6

14 Aug 2025, 18:34 UTC191 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

BTC USDT. Trying hard, same trendline, years of time spent around it. One trend, i.e. uptrend

10 Aug 2025, 20:27 UTC143 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

SAND USDT I had these levels marked for the last few years. I guess the person who has requested this should be able to verify it, as I have given this chart N number of times. It is range bound, and still doesn't have enough momentum to pass ATH. Major resistance is at $1

10 Aug 2025, 20:25 UTC111 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

4.1k and then 3.7k are the region we could see wicks

🔥1

10 Aug 2025, 20:23 UTC94 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

1D It's an uptrend driven by momentum; it's better if we do not retest below the recent low.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptowgrows. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CRYPTOSPACE” (@cryptowgrows), 193 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptowgrows.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.