На бинансе стал отрицательный фандинг, я решил выйти Сейчас спред те же 12.3%~, но из-за того, что токен упал сильно в деньгах спред стал меньше, короче получилось примерно +1.8%
🥰1😁1

Channel
@cryptowave0001
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
888subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002093996492 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptowave0001 |
| Description | Cвязь: @lozetka Чат: https://t.me/cryptowavechat Щитпостинг: https://t.me/+8CeN6VyhZHNhMjUy Забустить: https://t.me/boost/cryptowave0001 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptowave0001 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 888 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 888 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 889 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
88 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 16 | 18.2% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 14.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5289722755871162900 | 8 | 9.09% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5382026293166489702 | 6 | 6.82% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 5.68% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 4.55% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 3.41% | |
| custom 5449875850046481967 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.14% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptowave0001. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2025 to 19 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
На бинансе стал отрицательный фандинг, я решил выйти Сейчас спред те же 12.3%~, но из-за того, что токен упал сильно в деньгах спред стал меньше, короче получилось примерно +1.8%
🥰1😁1
https://uainvest.com.ua/arbitrage/SPCX-gate-spot-binance-swap Залился вот сюда по 12.3% примерно. Буду ждать ближе к 8% и выходить, полное сравнение не жду
🕊3
👋 Всем ку В субботу 14 марта планирую побывать на Monetora Conf (совместно с Mexc) Ребята выделили 5 билетов вам на розыгрыш! Всё просто, отдадим их просто самым быстрым Из условий - это подписаться на канал конференции И бахнуть плюсик под этим постом! UPD: Конец 💎 Канал | 💬 Чат | 📼 Ютуб
🤩2
⭐ Кстати да, раз уж написал сюда, то можно и ещё 1 постик сделать Есть свободная ликва, закинул немного в Avantis. 12% APR Явно не самый большой на рынке. Нооо потенциальный дроп от Base + потенциальный дроп от самого Avantis, в сумме выглядит уже получше Можно даже раскидать чуть по мультам. Скажем 1 мейн и n мультов по 100$ на акк~ ЛИНК Дроп от Base - единственный дроп, на который я ещё хоть немного надеюсь н…
❤🔥1
Стиль?
🔥6👏2😭1custom 52897227558711629001custom 53820262931664897021
👀 Ку, есть кто живой? Я ещё не полностью обнулился и не ушёл из крипты, тихонечко воркаем Хочу опять попробовать yobit отработать, как в прошлом году В целом буду делать то же самое, что и тогда, вот пост Сейчас им 11 лет, а не 10, как было в прошлом + рынку очень плохо, но всё-равно пробую ❤️ Бахните реакцию, если прочитали этот постик
🔥8custom 52897227558711629003👎1
Вот ребята детально расписали касаемо вчерашней ситуации (текст не мой): И так, что произошло вчера и почему Бинанс пидорасы Мы сразу опустим момент с Трампом и тарифами, это понятное влияние на все рынки. Но не он был причиной того, что многие люди проснулись без депозитов. 1. Винтермьют, как ручной маркетмейкер Бинанса, который уже был замечен за рагпулами, за пару часов перечисляет 700 мультов на биржу (около 2…
👍3
я вахуи
❤5😢2
🥶 Думаю многие видели, что подтвердили токен от Base Осталось только, чтобы подтвердили дроп, а не сделали какой-нибудь сейл на buildpad Вообще супер бык по base и надеюсь дропом не обидят, хоть и кошельков там очень-очень много Поэтому стоит забрать дс роли. Ролей там очень много, заберите все доступные, + посмотрите легкие какие есть https://guild.xyz/base Также там есть часть ролей за onchain summer 2024. Мей…
👍1
😇 Ну что вы, работяги? По towns написать хочу. Скорее всего видели чекер, видели, кто и на сколько eligible. Вроде иксы получили только ёрли и большие бомж акки Я написал про проект сразу на выходе, и сам зашёл в town 1 с 2 акков. Сейчас с одного аккаунта выходит 38к токенов, которые можно забрать сразу или 57к, которые можно забрать через 1 месяц. 🔵 Что буду делать я? 1 аккаунт частично захеджировал на премарке…
❤🔥3❤2🔥1🤝1
😂 Meteora https://edge.meteora.ag/points Выпустила чекер поинтов. Мой мейн видно на скрине, вроде как это не очень много. Делитесь, если фармил кто 💎 Канал | 💬 Чат | 📼 Ютуб | ✖️ Твиттер
❤🔥1
✔️ Sonic Неужели дождались дроп за 1й сезон и шарды? Сделали 2 таких твита, думаю сегодня должны дать чекер или что-то подобное. 🔵 https://x.com/paint_swap/status/1947252552141082784 🔵 https://x.com/SonicLabs/status/1947251275935957468 💎 Канал | 💬 Чат | 📼 Ютуб
👍4❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptowave0001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Wave” (@cryptowave0001), 888 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptowave0001.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.