Channel
@cryptoturtlehub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002536829815 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoturtlehub |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoturtlehub |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 11 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:47 | 13 | -1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 14 | -4 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 01:40 | 18 | +1 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 16:35 | 17 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 10 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 11 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 10 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 10 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
📅 CLARITY Act Faces September 15 Test Amid Low Odds from Grayscale 📊 Grayscale indicates the CLARITY Act's chances of passing in 2026 are slim. 📅 A procedural test is set for September 15, following the Senate's August recess. ⚖️ The Senate Banking Committee previously advanced the bill with a 15 to 9 bipartisan vote. 💰 Grayscale warns that without federal legislation, investment and development may shift overse…
🔒 BTCPay Limits Remote Lightning Access After Fund Theft 📊 Foundation and Citadel21 reported drained Lightning nodes. 🛡 Total amount stolen remains unknown. 💰 Number of affected operators is unspecified. ⚙️ BTCPay's action aims to enhance security measures. 📅 Incident highlights vulnerability in Lightning Network. The recent theft of funds has prompted BTCPay to restrict remote access to its Lightning Network, …
🚀 Bitcoin’s BIP-110 Enters Mandatory Signaling with Low Miner Support 📊 Bitcoin's BIP-110 has begun mandatory signaling, yet miner support remains below 3%. 🛡 This deployment milestone assesses the capability of enforcing nodes to maintain changes despite minimal miner signaling. ⚙️ Discussions are ongoing regarding a potential hard-fork fallback if the signaling does not improve. 📅 The situation highlights the …
🏛️ US Senate to advance CLARITY Act vote in September after Thune's cloture 📅 The US Senate is set to vote on the CLARITY Act this September. 🛡 This procedural step reinstates focus on crypto market structure legislation. ⚖️ Lawmakers are actively negotiating ethics and stablecoin provisions. 💰 The move reflects ongoing efforts to establish clearer regulations in the crypto sector. 📊 This development is crucial …
⚠️ Bitcoin BIP-110 fork could expose holders to replay attacks 📊 Bitcoin holders may risk losing actual BTC if they attempt to sell coins from a potential BIP-110 chain split without properly separating their balances. 🛡 The BIP-110 fork could jeopardize real Bitcoin as developer Kevin Loaec cautions against moving coins during this period. 📅 The BIP-110 proposal requires miners to signal support, with current s…
🔍 BitMEX Spent Two Years Seeking Buyer Before Shutdown 📊 BitMEX held sale discussions for two years without securing a buyer. 🛡 Founder control complicated negotiations due to equity retention by co-founders. 📉 Declining market share weakened buyer interest, with trading volumes dropping significantly. 💰 The exchange sought a valuation of around $1 billion during the sale process. 📅 Trading restrictions will beg…
🚀 EU to Revise MiCA Framework in 2027 Amid U.S. Stablecoin Developments 📅 EU officials set to revise the MiCA crypto framework in 2027. 🛡 Current rules leave non-EU stablecoins, like USDT, without authorization. ⚙️ Review may expand MiCA to include tokenized deposits and real-world assets. 💰 U.S. GENIUS Act adoption pressures EU to reassess regulations. 📊 Ongoing European Commission consultation aims to refine M…
📅 CLARITY Act Moves Towards September Vote in Senate 📊 The U.S. Senate has initiated the process for the CLARITY Act, with an initial procedural vote scheduled for September. 🛡 Senate Majority Leader John Thune filed the motion after a late-night voting session. 📅 Lawmakers are expected to return to Washington on Sept. 14. 💰 The legislation requires 60 votes to overcome the Senate's cloture threshold. ⚙️ Ongoing…
💰 Aztec exploiter deposits 300 ETH into Tornado Cash 📊 A wallet associated with the Aztec Private Rollup Bridge exploit has transferred an additional 300 ETH to Tornado Cash, increasing its total deposits to 500 ETH. 💰 The recent deposit is valued at approximately $572,000. 📈 Overall, the total amount linked to this wallet now stands at about $953,000. 🛡 The exploit in June resulted in a loss of around $2.165 mi…
🚀 Coinbase CEO: CLARITY Delay Won't Hinder Crypto Adoption 📊 Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong asserts that crypto adoption will persist through stablecoins, tokenization, and the expansion of digital asset markets, despite the Senate's delay of the CLARITY Act. 🛡 Armstrong emphasizes that the momentum in the crypto sector continues regardless of congressional schedules. He expressed disappointment over the Senate's…
💰 Domestic stablecoins could enhance demand for dollar-backed tokens: IMF 📊 IMF's Dan Katz highlights potential user preference for digital dollars due to liquidity benefits. 🛡 Digital dollars may leverage significant network effects for broader adoption. 💰 Cross-border acceptance is a key factor driving interest in dollar-backed stablecoins. ⚙️ The IMF emphasizes the role of domestic stablecoins in the evolving…
💰 US Sanctions 2 Crypto Exchanges Over Iran-Linked Funds 📊 U.S. authorities sanctioned crypto exchanges Shelbit and Aban Tether for allegedly facilitating Iran's evasion of financial restrictions linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). 🛡 The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) also sanctioned Siavash Kayvanpour, connected to a network of front companies associated with Shelbit. 💰 IRGC-linked …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptoturtlehub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Insights Turtle Hub” (@cryptoturtlehub), 11 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoturtlehub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.