Channel
@cryptotaskchannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
129subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001271133937 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptotaskchannel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptotaskchannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 129 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 131 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 131 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2021 to 4 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🗣 Hey freelancers. We strive to be fully decentralized platform where our users have full control of their own accounts and hopefully down the road - of the whole platform. However, without centralized authority and verification process that often comes with it, it's harder to weed out scammy employers. I am sure you have already noticed some patterns in their behaviour, but this is generally how they look and sound…
Hello everyone, we have gathered some questions recently asked on Twitter that might be a useful information for newcomers. Feel free to add questions you’d like to have answered! Q: You said CryptoTask is scaling network opportunities by introducing p2p affiliate marketing. How would you assure security of funds and p2p transactions? A: Transactions between freelancers and employers are handled by smart contract, …
🗣 Dear freelancers, kind reminder that if an employer asks for an initial fee, it is a scam. No serious employer will ask you to pay for anything upfront. ✌️
Dear freelancers, if an employer asks you for a picture of ID or a driving licence - it is most likely a scam. If you stumble upon such request, we kindly urge you to report it to us. Safe freelancing everyone ✌
2 weeks ago, before sharing our new website to other channels, we shared it here and on our Discord server asking for your thoughts, suggestions, and bug reports. ✍️ Ever since we've gotten quite a few so now that we've applied most of your suggestions, we're ready to share the summary of what we've done in our new Medium post. 📢
👍1
📢 Out with the old, in with the new. We’ve launched a 🎉NEW WEBSITE 🎉 and before we announce it on all other channels we’d appreciate your feedback. The goal was to improve the look to be in line with the new brand guidelines and upgrade features to make the user experience enjoyable and seamless. So what’s been done? 🧐 Other than the obvious 🦖, new features have been added and existing ones upgraded: 👉 Visibility pa…
👍1
CryptoTask Official Announcement Channel pinned a photo
We are happy to announce CryptoTask now supports Polygon. 🥳 Employers looking to hire freelancers will soon be able to deposit their escrow funds in Polygon stables: DAI, USDT and USDC, while taking advantage of lower gas fees and short block times.
New logo is just the beginning of the upcoming changes. Read more in our Medium: https://blog.cryptotask.org/new-cryptotask-logo-announcement-weve-initiated-the-big-rebranding-2f1fc766be7d
CTASK burning, Etherization and more! https://blog.cryptotask.org/the-big-update-26ba148520de
📢Here's the latest AMA recap (5 November) Our latest AMA recap is here! Let's take a look at what we talked about! Read the recap: ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🗣 Recap: https://blog.cryptotask.org/ama-session-recap-5-november-5f10e6bfac70 🐦 Tweet: https://twitter.com/ct_task/status/1457316059342639111?s=20
📢Here's the latest AMA recap (22 October) After the new roadmap updates, it’s our primary duty to speak to our community! Let's take a look at our latest AMA session highlights! Read the recap: ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🗣 Recap: https://blog.cryptotask.org/ama-session-recap-22-october-574a822e9a08 🐦 Tweet: https://twitter.com/ct_task/status/1452028318463692804
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptotaskchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 712,945 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoTask Official Announcement Channel” (@cryptotaskchannel), 129 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptotaskchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.