Channel
@cryptosignal_maidan
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002038920837 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptosignal_maidan |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptosignal_maidan |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @solcrpt01/2711 May 2025, 08:29 UTC | @cryptosignal_maidan/1185 · this entry30 May 2025, 15:18 UTC | 1.00 | 19 days |
| @cryptosignal_maidan/1174 · this entry30 May 2025, 15:06 UTC | @solcrpt01/3730 May 2025, 15:15 UTC | 1.00 | 8 minutes |
| @cryptosignal_maidan/1176 · this entry30 May 2025, 15:08 UTC | @solcrpt01/3930 May 2025, 15:15 UTC | 1.00 | 7 minutes |
| @cryptosignal_maidan/1177 · this entry30 May 2025, 15:09 UTC | @solcrpt01/4030 May 2025, 15:15 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @cryptosignal_maidan/1179 · this entry30 May 2025, 15:10 UTC | @solcrpt01/4130 May 2025, 15:15 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @cryptosignal_maidan/1178 · this entry30 May 2025, 15:10 UTC | @solcrpt01/4230 May 2025, 15:15 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @solcrpt01 | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 5 minutes | this entry (8–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 May 2025 to 15 June 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @solcrpt01. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 3 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
📡 NEXT CALL SIGNAL 📡 Date: June 5th Time: 15:00 UTC / 10:00 CST Chain: SOL If you understand the narrative behind $SPX6900 & $ASSDAQ, this next drop follows the same conviction. #DOWNJONES will wreck the entire Solana Ecosystem in less than 48 hours. 🐦 Official X is Live: https://x.com/DownJonesSolana Have your SOL ready to deploy! If you do not have any, you may get some through changenow.io, houdiniswap.com or …
$DOWNJONES is a slow cook but will be a once in life time generational play. One of the strongest team of developers behind this project. gPfTfKfFt8jCNHqfss4tsh5YtnKyfowkwhBZ5cVpump TWITTER | WEBSITE | PUMPSWAP
Down Jones is a stealth launch without any notice and is gearing up for its parabolic run. Don’t miss out on the opportunity for significant gains!
$DOWNJONES is the largest launch on Solana since Solana itself. Down Jones will be backed by the biggest VCs and whales in crypto. Pre buy this coin this low while you can Get in before the Masses.
gPfTfKfFt8jCNHqfss4tsh5YtnKyfowkwhBZ5cVpump TWITTER | WEBSITE | PUMPSWAP
You can anticipate $DownJones banners across platforms like DEXTools, Dexscreener, and many more cexes shortly! The whales are quietly loading up under the radar. The narrative is too good to be ruined. Socials have already been uploaded. 🌐 $DOWNJONES
Everybody that is apart of our community and is an investor in this token has a golden opportunity‼️ Marketing Campaign officially launches in minutes. Every single one of you in this group will know what an insider trader feels like when our marketing campaign begins‼️
Twitter KOLs and Telegram Alphas Groups will be launching this coin in less than 5 minutes. This is the final chance to grab your bag before #DOWNJONES launches to the moon 🚀 Don’t cry if you get left behind! 😢 We warned you 🚨
The CoinMarketCap listing is locked in, and as soon as our trading volume skyrockets, we’ll dominate visibility across the platform. This is just the beginning. More listings are on the way, and when they hit, it’ll send shockwaves through the market. Keep your focus sharp and your eyes on this space. The momentum is unstoppable. Stay tuned.
Missed BTC. pumping to $100k? Missed DOGE? Missed PEPE? Missed CHILLGUY? WHO CARES. #DOWNJONES will retire your next 3 generations!
🚨 LIVESTREAM VIDEO & CAMPAIGN STARTING IN 10-15 MINUTES: 🚨 🟢 Meet War Room members 🟢 Live BUY/SELL Signals 🟢 Meet the Dev behind $DOWNJONES Please join our live video stream and learn how #DOWNJONES is breaking barriers on $SOL, Phase 1-3 Plans, and why $DOWNJONES is redefining the entire blockchain landscape. The team is building something very promising! 🎉
Already in communication with binance We will be listed there within the week I’m sure everyone knows how much volume this brings
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptosignal_maidan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Майдан Криптосигналов” (@cryptosignal_maidan), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptosignal_maidan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.