CryptoScout | Life & Crypto 🕵️♂️
Тут не про мільйони, а про реальність. Кручуся в крипті зі 100$ у кишені. Мемкоїни, новини та мої будні. Без прикрас і успішного успіху 👇
посилання для друзів - https://t.me/+sbRdq1ABF-UxOTZi
Реклама - @whydesolase
Created
Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 722–724 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 02:06
723
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:43
723
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 723 subscribers
Avg views / post
121
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held
16 (9 July 2026 – 26 July 2026)
Views total
1,208
Reactions total
194
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 02:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
158
Videos
5
Links
67
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
289 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
82
28.4%
custom 5854766299690835045
36
12.5%
custom 5395779663211567344
26
9.00%
custom 5775916214874281431
25
8.65%
💅
23
7.96%
custom 5778476195771323325
21
7.27%
custom 5877561499311934833
18
6.23%
custom 5395449436061085058
14
4.84%
custom 5395722913808687231
12
4.15%
custom 5406745663906032175
10
3.46%
custom 5406854249269211051
6
2.08%
custom 5395782923091746235
4
1.38%
custom 5886662779825294115
4
1.38%
custom 5242195906199035850
3
1.04%
custom 5406759699859153518
3
1.04%
custom 5395716570141991217
2
0.692%
Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Як і обіцяв у попередньому пості, ділюся крутим матеріалом 🤑
Фаундер zerosupercycle випустив детальний лонгрід на Teletype про те, як правильно стартувати в X у 2026 році
Команда сильно старалась зібрати в статтю максимум з того, що тільки можливо. Так що підтримайте пост фаундера antlantics 🤩
Чувак, вже пройшла половина року. Що з того, що ти записував у цілі на 2026 рік, ти вже зробив?
Почни зараз, перестань со…
ПРО БАН В Х, ВТРАЧЕНИЙ БРЕНД ТА ЩО ДАЛІ 😁
Привіт, скаути. Сорян, що так давно не було постів, був фул фокус на Твіттері, тому часу на цей канал взагалі не залишалося
Останнім був пост про те, що мені дали бан. Минуло вже десь три дні, і за цей час у мене таке відчуття, ніби забрали чотири місяці життя та якусь частинку душі, блять... Я повторно подав апеляцію, але мені знову прийшов той самий шаблонний текст. Це вс…
ЇДУ В ХЕЛЛ 🙏
Треба трошечки відпочити на пекельному полу острові
Але шото по погодке отмєна, тут би хоча б 24 градуси побачить 😁
Всім ахуєєних вихідних, хоч вже і неділя
До речі, як вам стікери?❤️
СТАТИСТИКА Х ЗА ТИЖДЕНЬ 📲
Видно, що після локу, про який писав в цьому пості, мої перегляди активно збільшились
Приємно спостерігати за ростом охоплень. Я прям дійсно активно взявся, бо єбав ці блоки 😈
Хочу себе привітати з тим, що сьогодні перші $75 зароблені з твіттера. приємно, сучка
Одні тіпи запропонували мені зробити квоту на їхній пост та стати, грубо кажучи, їхнім партнером - а хто я такий, щоб відмовити?…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cryptoscoutt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,153,458 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@cryptoscoutt named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@whydesolace named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoScout 🇺🇦” (@cryptoscoutt), 723 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoscoutt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
