Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CryptoScamHunterAlert

@cryptoscamhunteralert

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

24subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001665450296
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoscamhunteralert
Created1 December 2021measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cryptoscamhunteralert

Growth

247 August 2026 — 24 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–25 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:4824no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:4624first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 1 December 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 December 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

4 Dec 2021, 19:10 UTC132 viewsread 11 August 2026

⚠️⚠️Alert New SCAM❌❌ "Fake Mining or Defi platform" The scammers suggest a DeFi or Mining platform using a link. Victims are encouraged to connect their wallets in order to earn a profit. Avoid these website: coinimtoken[.]com coinu2e[.]com jingdian114[.]net aneswap[.]com boster[.]io buxspcdv[.]com cpowerex[.]com deppspace[.]xyz dpethmin[.]com eth-666[.]app eth-ao[.]com ethbe[.]app eth-coinbasedf[.]com ethdapp[.]ne

Signed Bison

3 Dec 2021, 18:59 UTC99 viewsread 11 August 2026

Attenzione a tutti gli iscritti, questo canale è nato per segnalare siti truffa.

Signed Bison

3 Dec 2021, 18:43 UTC95 viewsread 11 August 2026

Education for @crypto users https://t.me/ScamExamples

Signed Bison

3 Dec 2021, 15:32 UTC72 viewsread 11 August 2026

⚠️⚠️Alert New SCAM❌❌ tradebaselimited[.]com This website acts like an investment company website that accepts funds from customers in order to invest them and earn a profit but it's a fraud. Don't send funds to them or you will lose them! Subscribe to more alerts @CryptoScamHunterAlerts

2 Dec 2021, 23:02 UTC69 viewsread 11 August 2026

⚠️⚠️Alert New SCAM❌❌ forexcapital-trading[.]com This website acts like an investment company website that accepts funds from customers in order to invest them and earn a profit but it's a fraud. Don't send funds to them or you will lose them! Subscribe to more alerts @CryptoScamHunterAlerts

2 Dec 2021, 22:27 UTC57 viewsread 11 August 2026

⚠️⚠️Alert New SCAM❌❌ mining-pool[.]app This website acts like a MINING platform where you can connect your wallet in order to deposit funds and earn interest. Don't connect your wallet or your funds will be stolen! Subscribe to more alerts @CryptoScamHunterAlerts

2 Dec 2021, 18:00 UTC52 viewsread 11 August 2026

Have you been scammed by a group, channel, user, ICO, service, bot or in any other way? Website: CryptoVigilante.News Contact: @RealCryptoV Chat: @CryptoVigilanteNetwork Email: [email protected] Not affiliated with The Dollar Vigilante https://t.me/CryptoVigilanteANN

2 Dec 2021, 16:14 UTC41 viewsread 11 August 2026

⚠️⚠️Alert New SCAM❌❌ premiumalliancelimited[.]com This website acts like an investment company website that accepts funds from customers in order to invest them and earn a profit but it's a fraud. Don't send funds to them or you will lose them! Subscribe to more alerts @CryptoScamHunterAlerts

2 Dec 2021, 16:13 UTC41 viewsread 11 August 2026

⚠️⚠️Alert New SCAM❌❌ defi-usdtetc[.]com or eth-gwing[.]com This website acts like a DEFI platform where you can connect your wallet in order to deposit funds and earn interest. Don't connect your wallet or your funds will be stolen! Subscribe to more alerts @CryptoScamHunterAlerts

2 Dec 2021, 16:10 UTCviews —

CryptoScamHunterAlert pinned «https://github.com/amoccia/CryptoScamHunter/blob/main/BlackList-OnlyDomains»

2 Dec 2021, 16:10 UTC40 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://github.com/amoccia/CryptoScamHunter/blob/main/BlackList-OnlyDomains

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @cryptoscamhunteralert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoScamHunterAlert” (@cryptoscamhunteralert), 24 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoscamhunteralert.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.