Channel
@cryptorobotics_trader
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
45subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003782819599 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptorobotics_trader |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 3 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptorobotics_trader |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 45 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 44 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 44 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (3 June 2026 – 14 July 2026) |
| Views total | 29 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
77 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 29 | 37.7% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 29.9% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 20.8% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 5.19% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.60% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔍 Trading setup for $POL/$USDT While Bitcoin remains uncertain, $POL is showing strength. ⚠️ Buys can be considered when the $0.0825–$0.0800 zone is tested and a reaction appears: • volume increase; • decline stops. 🎯 Target: resistance zone at $0.09–$0.095. ✖️ Stop-loss: • conservative option — below the local low, around $0.0784; • option for more experienced traders — exit if the price firmly consolidates belo…
👍2
📊 What’s happening with the market and what to trade? On Monday, in the main group, we published our plan for this week, and so far it is playing out well. The correction we talked about started quite sharply. The move was amplified by news about Strategy selling Bitcoin, but the drop was quickly bought back. 📈 In my opinion, for the next one or two weeks, we remain on the buyers’ side. Buys can be considered fro…
❤1👍1
What I check on the chart before entering a trade 🔎 Continuing our series of posts on how I choose trading signals. A signal is not a command to open a trade, but an idea that needs to be checked. That’s why before entering, I look at 4 factors: 🔹 Trend Where is the coin moving on a higher timeframe: 1H, 4H, or 1D? If the signal goes against a strong trend, the probability of a successful trade is lower. 🔹 Impuls…
❤2🔥1
🤖 TrendPal Has Passed Its First Market Test About 3 months ago, I talked about the TrendPal bot update. Now we can evaluate the results. The period was not easy: the market was under pressure, and many altcoins were declining. But according to the 3-month statistics, TrendPal shows +12.06%. Let us remind you, this is a spot bot. It does not open short positions and can only earn from buying. That is why such a res…
👍1🔥1
📉 Bitcoin lost almost 10%. What triggered the drop? Let’s break down what happened in the market last week. 📌 On June 22, positive news appeared about the resumption of negotiations between the U.S. and Iran. It seemed like a reason for growth, but Bitcoin gained only about 0.4%. Although the negotiations continued, investors were also selling off U.S. tech stocks, which caused their prices to drop sharply. Along …
👍2❤1
📉 What Happened to the Market? Over the past few days, Bitcoin has lost about 10% of its value. On Monday, in the CryptoRobotics Telegram channel, we noted that sellers still had the upper hand, so this move did not come as a surprise. 📊 The price has now tested the $60,700–$60,000 support zone and has already made two attempts to close below $59,000. So far, sellers have been unable to extend the decline, but buye…
🫡4👍2🔥2
📊 Which Types of Trades Do I Like the Most? There are many different types of trades in the market: reversals, breakouts, range trading, and others. I prefer trend continuation trades — when a coin is already showing a strong trend and I look for an opportunity to enter in the direction of that trend 📈 For example, the $TIA trade was stopped out, but I still consider the idea a good one. The coin maintained an upt…
👍2
🔍 Found an interesting signal in Jumper Stars — $TIA/$USDT $TIA looks stronger than the overall market: the price is already reacting from a buying zone, volume has increased, and the delta is rising, showing stronger interest from market participants. 📍 Entry: $0.38–$0.385 ✖️ Stop: $0.368 🎯 Targets: $0.43–$0.46 The nearest resistance level is $0.402. You can take partial profits there or simply watch how the pric…
❤3🔥3👍2
📊 What's Happening in the Market Right Now? On Monday, I published my market scenario for this week in the CryptoRobotics Telegram channel. It has already played out, so here’s a quick update. 📈 Bitcoin reached the important $67,200 zone, after which the price started pulling back. Right now, $BTC is trading around the $65,200–$64,600 area. This is an important support zone — a level where buyers have previously s…
👍4🔥2
📊 Why You Shouldn’t Enter Every Signal. Part 2 Many beginners believe that if a strategy has a 70% win rate, then it must be a good one. But in trading, what matters is not only the win rate, but also the overall mathematics of the system. 📉 Losses in the market are inevitable, and this is something you need to accept. Even the best traders and algorithms regularly close trades at a loss. But sometimes it is enoug…
❤1👍1💋1🔥1
📊 Why You Shouldn’t Enter Every Signal Continuing our series on choosing trading signals. Beginners often think: the more trades you open, the higher your chances of making money. In practice, the opposite can happen. For example, you open long positions on $ETH, $SOL, $ADA, and $BNB. Formally, these are four different trades. But if $BTC suddenly drops, there is a high probability that these coins will also start…
❤4👍1👏1💯1
Why I’m Not Rushing to Buy Yet Hello everyone! I reviewed the signals on our platform, and most of them are currently pointing toward buys. This aligns with our analysis in the CryptoRobotics channel, but I wouldn’t be too optimistic just yet. 📉 Sellers are still putting strong pressure on the market. The Fear & Greed Index is showing extreme fear, and many people see this as the perfect time to buy. But a good mar…
👍5🔥3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @cryptorobotics_trader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 23,712 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoRobotics Trader’s Channel” (@cryptorobotics_trader), 45 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptorobotics_trader.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.