Channel
@cryptoreepercalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
75subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001691446688 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoreepercalls |
| Description | 100x calls. Let’s unearth these uniswap gems, based calls and degen calls across numerous chains including ftm, bsc and avalanche. Any queries @CryptoReeper |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoreepercalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 75 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 75 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 76 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 21 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Elon went full Chibi!!! Now X is slowly turning into a Chibi platform… …and somehow people are still sleeping on: $CHIBI (ETH) 👀 This is how narratives actually start: • meme → aesthetic • aesthetic → culture • culture → BILLIONS Right now, Chibi is still in the aesthetic phase. That’s where the biggest money is made. 💠 Ticker: $CHIBI 📍 Chain: ETH 📄 CA: 0x06Db18D27Edfea1b1eDA176369a4798aa2adD407 📊 Chart: https:/…
Well done on the win chads - let’s get back to trenching
Photo, posted without a caption
5hpPpQcHMM6X325RVjmvxmwEGE1BAtKM3bZPH3YLBAGS - 30k Rewards are going to Gui - a previous employee at both Metamask and Vercel, now currently at Solana. He has also been tweeting about Ralph - hopefully the stars align on this one…
🆕 | MOON BUY! by @MajorBuyBot 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🔷 SOL 10.8200 ($1967.18) 🪙 MOON 9127910.21 (Tx) 🔎 Position: New Holder (Wallet) 📈 MCap: $215,513 📊 Dex 💲 Buy
🆕 | MOON BUY! by @MajorBuyBot 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🔷 SOL 0.8175 ($148.47) 🪙 MOON 745730.83 (Tx) 🔎 Position: +16.36% (Wallet) 📈 MCap: $199,088 📊 Dex 💲 Buy
Around 7x from my initial call chads
🆕 | MOON BUY! by @MajorBuyBot 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🔷 SOL 28.1264 ($5004.25) 🪙 MOON 41911574.50 (Tx) 🔎 Position: +102.70% (Wallet) 📈 MCap: $119,400 📊 Dex 💲 Buy
🆕 | MOON BUY! by @MajorBuyBot 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 🔷 SOL 16.8648 ($3000.59) 🪙 MOON 40807739.95 (Tx) 🔎 Position: New Holder (Wallet) 📈 MCap: $73,530 📊 Dex 💲 Buy
@MoonMintAI - 30k. I'm loving the tech and the narrative on the $sol space. The same dev has also recently launched @StockDropSOL (ath was 250k), think that this one could be a sendor chads (DYOR as always)!!!! CA:7QttcmLnwjJ19XgTwCatCKaxWuK5QDn3fNBwnTcyRREV Tg: http://t.me/MoonMintAI Website: moonmint.ai X: https://x.com/moonmintai?s=21&t=-hlfd0_ViMKj6Cq1uSWuFQ
JUST IN: $4,000 $ETH @WatcherGuru
Elon liked our meme..we are getting more n more exposure from Elon Elon will start bullposting about $SUPERGROK SOON
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cryptoreepercalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cryptoreepercalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Reeper Calls” (@cryptoreepercalls), 75 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoreepercalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.