2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 03:47
121
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:57
121
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
186
Videos
15
Links
133
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6s
Average length
3s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
176 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
70
39.8%
👍
47
26.7%
🏆
15
8.52%
custom 6325801814084028226
12
6.82%
👀
10
5.68%
❤
8
4.55%
👌
7
3.98%
🌭
3
1.70%
🍓
2
1.14%
💯
2
1.14%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2024 to 14 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
DOG'S сообщил, что 14 августа — последний день когда можно получить токены.
1️⃣Те, кто еще не заходил, — у вас есть последний день, чтобы получить токены за свою активность в Telegram.
2️⃣Выполняем все социальные задачи и обязательно задание с проведением транзакции через 📱TON-кошелек (0,6$) ( есть слух, что таким образом будут брить ботов)
Переходите в Dog's 😑 получайте монету 🪙 за Ваш аккаунт, выполняйте задания👨…
😑Dogs - приложуха, начисляющая монеты за возраст твоего телеграмм аккаунта (чем старее, тем больше монет⬆️)
Изначально не присматривался к нему, так как не верил, и зря так как потерял кучу 🪙 типа ежедневных поинтов😱
Но сейчас токен торгуется по цене 0.01 на премаркете биржи BitGet 🤑🤑🤑
Поэтому залетайте 🔣ссылке🔣 и лутайте монеты
Займет меньше минуты⌛️ и может принести пару 🤑
Chat💬
Друзья❗️
Не прошло так много времени, как у RobinHood’a стартовал конкурс на поинты 😂
Немного позже обещают разыграть ценные 🎁 (пока умалчивают какие🤔)
Поэтому сейчас:
1️⃣Залетаем в группу (https://t.me/robin_hood_ton)
2️⃣Читаем условия
3️⃣Лутаем призы
Chat💬
Привет криптаны🤑
Давно не писал, так как не видел действительно интересных и перспективных проектов🧐
Недавно наткнулся на крутой проект RobinHood😂,где мы выступаем роли лепреконов, киты в роли варваров , а команда позиционирует себя как Робин Гуда.
У команды есть все амбиции свергнуть нынешнюю власть варваров, которые, так сказать, грабят и забирают последние копейки у лепреконов.
На данный момент проект имеет бот…
Возможно вы уже в курсе, но Павел Дуров официально поддержал TapSwap🥰🤑
Мы уже знаем, что это хороший знак😈
Время залететь в тапалку ещё есть, так что тап-тап)))
Чего дампим?? Немцы...
💰 Правительство Германии недавно начало отмывать огромную кучу бабок в битках с помощью неизвестных кошельков. Недавно они перевели 6700 BTC (больше $300 млн.) на биржи Kraken, Bitstamp и Coinbase разными транзакциями.
Всю движуху спалил Arkham в связи с чем вся толпа знатно перевозбудилась, а манипуляторы под шумок слили рынок. Ну 60к так 60к😑. Вернемся к немцам. Оказывается на балансе прави…
👍4👀3🔥2🌭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptoprostoua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2024 to 14 August 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@cryptoprostoua named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@robin_hood_ton named in 3 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto prosto” (@cryptoprostoua), 121 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoprostoua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.