https://t.me/nolenpcesp

Channel
CryptoPredictor
@cryptopredictor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
87subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001271072454 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptopredictor |
| Description | Si me quieres contactar con privado puedes hacerlo en cryptopredictor1@gmail.com |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 7 January 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptopredictor |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 87 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 87 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 January 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 November 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 19
- Links
- 12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Ahí tenéis toda la información
https://m.forocoches.com/foro/showthread.php?t=8837352
Hoy os puedo dar una gran noticia y es que el canal de insiders de Blue Magic Capital ha lanzado su moneda HOY. Normalmente las monedas se pillan muy arriba y días después de que salgan pero quiero premiaros a los que seguís aquí con esta gema.
Chicos, gracias a los que lleváis en este grupo años.
https://nomics.com/exchanges/raydium/markets/GwdRavfhNJqrAMvVAEgjrWKvBrGmXaMaeuf3yaMh4z3Q
Hay mucha incertidumbre estos días sobre que va a pasar...¿Que crees?
- Seguiremos en Bear Market45%
- Bull Market en breve55%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Que opinas de Elon Musk?
- Es alguien especial con una mentalidad única y debería ser libre de twittear lo que quiera sobre BTC50%
- Es alguien especial con una mentalidad única pero no debería twittear sobre BTC20%
- Le odio y le deseo lo peor30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Si queréis leer más sobre ella, hay un chat oficial con mas de 800 miembros
https://t.me/OrbsNetwork
Orbs
Os dejo esta moneda , muy interesante, para que investiguéis. Esta sacando un montón de acuerdos interesantes y cómo veis por eso está subiendo tantísimo, pero mientras el mercado siga BULL esta moneda va a seguir subiendo.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptopredictor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Hay mucha incertidumbre estos días sobre que va a pasar...¿Que crees?
- Seguiremos en Bear Market45%
- Bull Market en breve55%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Que opinas de Elon Musk?
- Es alguien especial con una mentalidad única y debería ser libre de twittear lo que quiera sobre BTC50%
- Es alguien especial con una mentalidad única pero no debería twittear sobre BTC20%
- Le odio y le deseo lo peor30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2021 to 8 November 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@cryptopredictor named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoPredictor” (@cryptopredictor), 87 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptopredictor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.