The Harmony blockchain was exploited after hackers used “empty blocks” to mint 4B $ONE, equal to 26% of the total supply. Around 2.8B $ONE has already been moved to exchanges, causing the token to drop 22%. Official announcement

Channel
Crypto News ⚡️
@cryptonewss_eng
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20,150subscribers
+158 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001364976236 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptonewss_eng |
| Description | Crypto News ⚡️ admin @KristenCrypt |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptonewss_eng |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 20,150 | -56 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 20,206 | -139 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 20,345 | -181 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 20,526 | +871 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 19,655 | -214 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 19,869 | -123 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 19,992 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 19,992 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 26.2%
- avg views ÷ 20,150 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,280
- 26 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.018%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 26
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (19 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 137,330 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 488
- Videos
- 24
- Links
- 317
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Precidian Investments receives U.S. patent for asset-backed digital tokens that can convert to ETF shares - Precidian
Vitalik Updates Ethereum’s Roadmap: New Priorities Revealed Vitalik has reshuffled Ethereum’s development roadmap, elevating quantum security as a top concern—while deprioritizing VDFs and most EVM enhancements. Verkle trees are being phased out in favor of ZK-friendly Patricia Bridge Trees (PBT). Privacy is now a central objective, with initiatives like privacy pools, wormholes, and keyed nonces taking center stag…
Brazil will require crypto firms to delay transfers above $10,000 to self-custody wallets or foreign platforms for 24 hours after an account is funded. The rule, covering stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies, takes effect Jan. 1, 2027.
🔥1
Crypto payments platform Coinsbuy was drained of more than $7.9 million across Ethereum and TRON, according to onchain investigator Specter.
🔥1
MetaMask has launched Agent Wallet, a wallet for AI agents that lets them execute crypto transactions independently within predefined limits and rules. All transactions are simulated and security-checked before execution, with Transaction Protection covering eligible transactions for up to $10,000 per month.
👍1
Marex invests in Digital Prime Technologies to advance institutional digital asset lending platform - Prnewswire
Morgan Stanley has increased its position in Bitcoin by 114 BTC, bringing the bank's total assets under management to over 6200 BTC.
Strategy says it will continue selling Bitcoin and no longer allocate all new capital to BTC purchases. ⚡️TOKENSALE | Crypto news
Robinhood posted record Q2 revenue of $1.31B as a 44% trading surge drove profits to new highs 📊💸 Net income climbed 48% to $573 million, boosted by options, equities, and a tenfold jump in event contracts.
SBI rebrands security subsidiary as Digital Practice to build Canton Network financial infrastructure - sbigroup.co.jp
🚨 Trade.xyz faces $60M in crypto liquidation losses due to AI-driven market anomaly.
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @cryptonewss_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,052,164 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto News ⚡️” (@cryptonewss_eng), 20,150 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptonewss_eng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.