Channel
@cryptoneeerds
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
91subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001761351708 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoneeerds |
| Description | Заработать денег в крипте - легко Проебать в крипте - ещё проще |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoneeerds |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 91 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
251 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 61 | 24.3% | |
| 👍 | 61 | 24.3% | |
| 🐳 | 38 | 15.1% | |
| 🤩 | 33 | 13.1% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 10.8% | |
| 🕊 | 23 | 9.16% | |
| ✍ | 8 | 3.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2025 to 7 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptoneeerds. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 February 2025 to 7 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всех приветствую братва, год выдался четкий, несмотря на большое количество лузов. Хочется пожелать всем успеха и стремления становиться лучше. Делайте че по кайфу, наслаждайтесь жизнью не только по праздникам, а каждый день, проведите время с родными и близкими, чтобы полным сил ворваться в 26 год. Посмотрите чего вы достигли, чему научились и с кем познакомились, если в моменте нет желаемого результата, то на диста…
❤7🔥3🤩3
Ало долбаебы, вы байбэки будете объявлять, где мм, где технологии сука
❤6🕊2
Так братва, всем здарова с кем не виделись✋ Вечером был троху занят, так что будете читать с утра. Во первых, хочется рассказать че как прошел месяц, а начался он нихуево благодря арбитражу uxlink. Одна тир 100 помойка принимала депы после взлома еще на протяжении 4 часов следующего дня, удалось вынести копеечку, но оставил этим пидорасам еще полторушку, ибо поздно увидел, что бабки в бск закончились. Через неделю …
🐳7🤩6✍3👍3
Седня выкачу пост про метеору и че по чем вышло🤔
👍6❤2🔥2
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍4🐳3❤1
Трамп ебаный, если мужское имеется на перчатках давай выйдем, ебло утино
🤩8
@k_cryptt х @cryptoneeerds Да уж братва, затянули мы, анонсом, выходит на неделю позже запланированного.. Ну вы не обессудьте, мы работали…☕️ Представляем вашему вниманию K COMMUNITY - новый чат нашего канала с БЕСПЛАТНЫМИ инструментами которые возможно как-то вам пригодятся в работе! Внутри нашего комьюнити чата вы найдете:😍 ▪️Ветку с комьюнити коллами ▪️Ветку с разблядовками по листингам ▪️Ветку с ботами для пои…
🔥5❤4👍4🐳1
Открыл глаза, увидел твит, подумал что сплю, через 10 секунд я подскочил и на всю хату уже играл айс кьюб, сейчас выбираю себе ламбу, как проходит ваш вторник?
👍8❤5🔥2✍1🤩1
Ну что братки, все помнят как я писал пост про коллабу? Так вот, мне в личку с предложением отписал мой друг, по совместительству админ канала Crypto Nerds. Сейчас мы плотно работаем над годным продуктом для вас, так что обязательно подписывайтесь на его канал, на меня, чтобы оставаться в курсе событий, совсем скоро расскажем что мы для вас подготовили🤫 @k_cryptt х @cryptoneeerds SOON…
🔥7👍4❤3🐳2
Приветствую хлопцы, рыночек оживает, моя холдерская соль с времен метеоры вышла в хороший плюс, в целом вся экосистема показывает себя не плохо, а если брать во внимание отдельно, то лидером будет пф, который запустил новую мету для стримеров и потенциально может покормить. Думаю, вы заметили, что памп фан начал активно расти, все это связано с тем, что они начали делать байбек с профита, тем самым запушив цену в не…
👍6❤5🤩3
Ну что братики, через 20 минкт листинг линеи на споте на всеми известных биржах, на мексе торги уже пошли, ищите арбитражные ситуации и успейте вылить по вкусной цене. Мои мысли такие: думаю не многие будут депать на биржи, поскольку сибил аков дохуя и отправлять это все равно что терять драгоценный профит, так что арбитраж декс/цекс будет актуален, единственное, смотрите на количество блоков, чтобы не сидеть вахуе …
❤8🐳4🕊4👍1🤩1
Гвала писдец
❤5👍2🤩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptoneeerds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 980,622 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Nerds” (@cryptoneeerds), 91 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoneeerds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.