Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Акс

@cryptomonada

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

425subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002212859088
TypeChannel
Username@cryptomonada
DescriptionПривет Чат: https://t.me/+Ch1ggiOAxNcwYzEy
Created19 June 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cryptomonada

Growth

4256 Aug 2026, 09:19 — 425 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:30 — 425 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:196 Aug 2026, 19:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 424–426 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:30425no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:19425first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 19 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

203 reactions across 13 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3316.3%
custom 52424710804587541732813.8%
2813.8%
custom 52445065255898725752210.8%
🔥209.85%
custom 5242329359422886749104.93%
🌭73.45%
custom 524270988064041075762.96%
custom 524499674027213287662.96%
❤‍🔥62.96%
🕊62.96%
😎62.96%
😨62.96%
🙉62.96%
52.46%
custom 524268668781701196341.97%
custom 524448467279626957020.985%
🥰20.985%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2024 to 23 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Mar 2026, 12:18 UTC490 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

$bp клоуны конечно, выйти по 200m fdv раздав 50m на дроп напомню, что в октябре Армани флексил 20m заработанными комиссиями за месяц, а за год команда получила свыше 100m комиссионных у меня такого ректа не было даже с zeta и drift, ни в $, ни в %

custom 52445065255898725757custom 52449967402721328763custom 52423293594228867492

5 Mar 2026, 16:06 UTC672 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мне больно смотреть на криптусов. Они живут в какой-то своей реальности? Позавчера пацаны извиняются за то, что были слишком оптимистичны на счёт альтсезона и сейчас имеют просадку в -75% Вчера записывают видео с НОВОЙ СТРАТЕГИЕЙ: ежемесячный откуп, 50% банка в «фундаментальные» монеты из топ 25 coinmarketcap и 50% спекуляции Пиздец. Других слов нет. Какой фундаментал в хай риск активах? Сколько раз топ 25 сменял

custom 524247108045875417316custom 52426866878170119634custom 52449967402721328762custom 52445065255898725751

2 Mar 2026, 10:49 UTC682 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как опинион пофармили? После фомо по лимитлес я очень хотел залететь в предикшн мету Но в итоге нашёл 0 неэффективностей и потратил максимум 100$ на тесты. Потыкал и скипнул: предиктфан, опинион, пробабл, полик Больше всего с опинион я не понимал одну вещь: Все фармят поинты с расходником 20-30 и даже 40$, при этом закладывают в расход СПРЕД. Кто покупал эти поинты по 40-60$ - без комментариев А какие проекты раз

custom 524450652558987257511custom 52423293594228867495custom 52444846727962695702custom 52449967402721328761

20 Feb 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,590 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

фарм бекпека с 450+% годовых вводные 1. по слухам официально можно хеджить мейн аккаунт с суббаккаунтом и за это не сбреют 2. последние 3+ недели за удержание поз дают много поинтов, а их себестоимость стремится к 0: комиссии за открытие, но можно держать неделями стратегия открываете лонг на мейне, на суббакке хеджируете шортом чтобы максимально эффективно использовать банк (и фармить больше поинтов), делаете это

custom 524247108045875417312custom 52427098806404107576custom 52423293594228867493custom 52445065255898725753

2 Feb 2026, 20:03 UTC≈1,030 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

А как вы пофармили бекпек?

😁171

12 Jan 2026, 11:28 UTC≈1,280 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вторые 50% я слил по в 3.17 в среднем, на анонсах байбеков, продав хаи (это не скилл, а везение) По заветам фруктового сада нарисовал график, если вам больно на него смотреть в одиночку. Скотч, которые отрабатывает в 100% случаев. 2-2.2$ лои, 3.5-4$ новые хаи на анонсе стейкинга и секс листингах. Я вне актива P.S. Спасибо @cryppi_hub за упоминания в 2 каналах. Без тебя я бы не решился вести криптаблок 🫂 Новогодние

😁16🔥7

4 Jan 2026, 14:07 UTC≈2,120 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я слил 50% дропа лайтера и вот почему После дропа $hype, 80% которого продал по 9.9$ было ощущение что с $lit повторится рост с 3$ до 5-8$ Но сейчас я не уверен в этом, слил 50% по 2.65$ Главные факторы роста это анонсы и листинги (coinbase, bybit и другие уже анонсировали спот) Но команда темнит, никаких роадмапов, дедлайнов, анонсов. Только расплывчатые формулировки в X. Байбеки вроде есть, но выкупить 32k$ за

27🔥95

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @cryptomonada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 185,574 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Акс” (@cryptomonada), 425 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptomonada.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.