Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CRYPTOMETA

@cryptometamedia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,201subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001659343065
TypeChannel
Username@cryptometamedia
Created10 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptometamedia

Growth

2,2012,2162,208.57 August 2026 — 2,216 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,216 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,214 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,208 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,201 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,199–2,218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:172,201-7
10 Aug 2026, 14:072,208-6
7 Aug 2026, 18:542,214-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:002,216no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:522,216first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 35s
Average length
9m 35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

224 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8035.7%
2611.6%
❤‍🔥2511.2%
💩219.38%
🔥146.25%
🍾135.80%
🤣135.80%
🎉104.46%
73.13%
🐳73.13%
👎31.34%
🤔20.893%
🤬20.893%
🗿10.446%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2024 to 27 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Oct 2025, 08:14 UTC473 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @pgdvs_lawPhoto

Как не сесть за крипту 💸 Если вы работаете в крипте или просто принимаете оплату в USDT — возможно, этот вебинар вам пригодится. 📅 28 октября в 13:00 по МСК проведем открытый вебинар вместе с адвокатом Вероникой Поляковой, специализирующейся на делах о мошенничестве и экономических преступлениях. Тема — не теоретическая. Речь пойдет о ситуациях, когда токен или смарт-контракт становятся не активом, а вещественным д

👍2🔥211

Signed Игорь Ильин

3 Feb 2025, 09:22 UTC≈1,320 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пишут, что сегодня ночью был рекорд по ликвидациям. Даже в коронадампе такого не было и при крахе FTX. Поэтому если есть, чем усреднять - надо усреднять

💩3

Signed Igor Ilin

3 Feb 2025, 09:20 UTC≈1,270 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

-50%))))))))))))))))))

💩41

Signed Igor Ilin

3 Feb 2025, 04:54 UTC≈1,220 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вместо Прибыли +30 % Скидка -30 % Для усреднения или набора позиции по действительно хорошим ценам.

💩3

Signed Igor Ilin

2 Feb 2025, 20:43 UTC902 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну что, в целом кроме STRK всё очень твёрденько выглядит. В таком красном пекле от сигнала -5, -10 процентов. Где аплодисменты?)))

🍾4👎21🐳1

Signed Igor Ilin

2 Feb 2025, 05:10 UTC934 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍2🐳1👎1🔥1

Signed Igor Ilin

2 Feb 2025, 05:07 UTC824 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Быстро взяли жопки в кулачки и пошли закупаться! В такое утро прекрасно зайти в сделки. Просто во всё что угодно из нижеперечисленного. KAS STRK ETH LTC WIF Все монетки кроме эфира процентов на 20 отскочат уже на след неделе. Нот финаншл эдвайс

👍3💩3🤣3🔥1

Signed Igor Ilin

1 Feb 2025, 20:25 UTC395 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Так-с парни, реальный трейд случится со дня на день. Возможно даже этой ночью. Монета WIF. Ожидаю памп на 30-40 %. Сейчас монета стоит в районе 1 доллара. Просесть может ещё сквизом до 0.95 Котлетим но без больших плеч, плиз.

💩2👍1🤔1🤣1

Signed Igor Ilin

1 Feb 2025, 20:25 UTC360 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И это нон финаншл адвайс

💩1🤣1🤬1

Signed Igor Ilin

1 Feb 2025, 20:25 UTC355 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Заходите на котлету, пока она не отлетела. Выше 1.2 потом уже не заходите. Сейчас надо заходить

💩1🤣1

Signed Igor Ilin

1 Feb 2025, 20:25 UTC542 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У монеты профессиональные маркетмейкеры. Они сначала имея в руках бОльшую часть монет разогнали цену до огромных хаёв. Затем они на каждой коррекции показывали силу покупателя и распродавали монеты по высоким ценам. Сейчас они подошли к достаточно сильному с психологической точки зрения уровню сопротивления. Теперь их задача показать публике, что около доллара цена будет очень твёрдой и что это реальное дно. Поэ

💩2🤣2🗿1🤬1

Signed Igor Ilin

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptometamedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CRYPTOMETA” (@cryptometamedia), 2,201 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptometamedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.