Channel
@cryptomemememe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
71subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002274007108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptomemememe |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptomemememe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 71 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 70 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 70 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
21 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 61.9% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 23.8% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ETH / Crypto Update Ethereum reached the retracement target zone from the $1,500 base, but the follow-through has been weak. The market has had several chances to build momentum from this area, and so far it has not done enough. That matters because the broader risk environment is starting to weaken again. Equities sold off yesterday, Nasdaq futures continue to trade lower, and crypto is still not showing the kind…
👍3❤1
Crypto Weekly Outlook: The Relief Rally Reaches Its First Real Test The rebound into the end of last week looked encouraging, but it was not driven by a major improvement in crypto fundamentals. Bitcoin’s move back toward $64,000 was helped by liquidations, a weaker dollar and renewed strength in Asian AI and semiconductor stocks. — In other words, part of the move was positioning and short covering rather than a cl…
👍1
No analysis here, just some quick commentary following my last update calling for a relief rally from the $1500 level. We rallied to $1800; Trump/Iran news once again causing risk-off. The bounce we saw the first week of July was interrupted by a flare up in the Strait of Hormuz. More retaliation is expected overnight; however, I believe that another ceasefire is right around the corner. The US can't afford high oil…
Not much has changed at the macro level. 1. Iran/US still finding room to talk despite mutual strikes over the weekend. 2. Equity markets are once again rallying However: 1. The AI trade is still in the forefront and has taken much attention away from crypto and defi. 2. Inflation is still in front of us. Not only energy risk, but LLM token prices have been seeing a 20% increase in price recently, which will add t…
Very quick update: Looks like we may be getting a relief rally this week from the double bottom at $1500.
The market remains weak with BTC testing the 58-60k zone and ETH underperforming. Liquidations continue in the hundreds of millions, while DeFi TVL contracts further amid reduced yields and capital rotation. Core factors sustaining the pressure: Hawkish Fed stance under Chair Warsh combined with elevated inflation readings has eliminated near-term rate cut expectations and introduced higher-for-longer risks. This we…
❤2👍1🔥1
BTC Daily and 1 Hour Charts There’s an old Wall Street saying: even a dead cat will bounce if it falls from a great enough height. That’s the point of a dead cat bounce. After a sharp sell-off, price often recovers for a few sessions because the market becomes oversold, shorts take profits, and dip buyers rush in thinking they caught the low. But that does not mean the trend has changed. Bitcoin’s Friday sell-off…
With the trading day almost complete in New York, we should see more volatility as traders adjust into the weekend. Current sell-off has intensified and BTC has now broken $60k and is now trading near the $59k handle. If there is a flash crash, it may present an opportunity similar to October mentioned earlier today.
Crypto Context pinned «After such a nice bounce back - I have decided to sell all crypto. I AM OUT. I will be looking to get back in at better prices.»
Just looking back at April ETH analysis, the break of $2k opened the trap door through which price continues to freefall. On that day, I mentioned $1400-$1500 as a deep support zone - this support zone may be at risk and I see a low in the $800s (honestly, hopefully not lower than that!); this low level is being considered in case capitulation takes place in the next few weeks/months. As the breakdown in support acr…
Quick Update: Red Friday Discounts )) Discount or not depends on where we are at the end of the summer; however, the discount is a confirmation of weeks of updates. The important timing will be on entering the market for the next bull run. We still have time and will most likely deal with more pain in the short term.
Bitcoin is now in the zone where psychology starts to matter more than the headlines. Over the last few days, friends have started writing me with real concern about the continuation lower. That is usually an important signal. Not because fear means the bottom is automatically in, but because markets change character when people stop thinking rationally and start reacting emotionally. This is the part of the move w…
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @cryptomemememe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,307,098 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Context” (@cryptomemememe), 71 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptomemememe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.