Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cryptomadcap

Channel

Cryptomadcap

@cryptomadcap

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

581subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001148453339
TypeChannel
Username@cryptomadcap
CreatedBetween 1 January 2017 and 6 February 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptomadcap

Growth

581584582.56 August 2026 — 584 subscribers6 August 2026 — 584 subscribers14 August 2026 — 583 subscribers20 August 2026 — 581 subscribers6 August 202620 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 581–584 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 05:04581-2
14 Aug 2026, 00:25583-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:02584no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:41584first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 February 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

8 Jan 2023, 12:01 UTC647 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

$SOL 4h The final 5th wave is coming 📈 I think we’re gonna grab that liquidity.

7 Sept 2021, 16:39 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

BTC/USDT analysis 📊 1D Time Frame ⏳ ➡️ Today is a correction day for BTC with the price losing almost -20% intra day so far. ➡️ The drop has been contained exactly on the 0.5 Fibonacci retracement level, just below the 1D MA50, confirming its importance bias. ➡️ If BTC manages to close the session above it, it will be a buy opportunity similar that the 1D MA50 gave from October 2020 until the April 14 2021 All Ti

22 Mar 2021, 18:27 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 6 August 2026

Eth will potentially hit 10k-15k dollar within this year. One of the best asset of the year 2021.

5 Sept 2020, 12:10 UTC≈2,610 viewsread 6 August 2026

BTC analysis I believe we are not done with this pullback until the CME Gap is filled The 200-Day EMA is coming right there + the declining resistance trendline from last year’s high A retest of that area will be pretty textbook 💭 It’s just a pullback inside a bigger bullish structure

2 Sept 2020, 14:39 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 6 August 2026

#SXP ( BINANCE ) BUY : 0.00020000 - 21500 Target 1 : 0.00027500 Target 2 : 0.00034000 Target 3 : 0.00048000 Stop Loss : 0.00006800 #midterm

27 Jul 2020, 09:56 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 6 August 2026

⚠️Time to be cautious since there is a TD-9 Sell on the Daily BTC chart 📌This indicator has been pretty accurate at calling local tops resulting into 5-20% pullbacks If we don’t manage to close above the resistance level today, this will look like a perfect top In addition, there’s a decent gap on CME BTC Futures at 9925-9645 + Funding on BitMEX is pretty high, which incentivises a Long Squeeze

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptomadcap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cryptomadcap” (@cryptomadcap), 581 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptomadcap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.