Photo, posted without a caption
❤2🤣2

Channel
@cryptokryshtal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
310subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001131001813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptokryshtal |
| Description | 💎 Дмитро Кришталь 🚀 Лідер думок у крипті | Маркетинговий радник топових криптопроєктів 🎧 Techno DJ & Producer із 16-річним стажем 🏎 Автоентузіаст і колекціонер унікальних машин 🔗 8 років у крипті: досвід, інсайти, стратегії 📩 Зв’язок: @ask_kryshtal_bot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptokryshtal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 310 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 310 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 February 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 217 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 25 | 40.3% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 30.6% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 8.06% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 4.84% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 3.23% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 3.23% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.61% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptokryshtal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 February 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2🤣2
sign up for https://openai.devpost.com/ they're handing out codex credits Once signed up: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdC7HTfPIxZQPff-ntg4kjjQogBkolEWEW8HisE0CZUsH9EvQ/viewform $100 expire 31 July
вот это поворот https://fixupx.com/levelsio/status/2075210426875249056?s=20
💘1
We launched Solana Campus — an educational platform where Web3 is taught like at a university. 6 courses. 36 lessons. Exams with grades and GPA. An on-chain diploma. From blockchain basics to practical DeFi on Solana. Supercharging your knowledge: campus.jpool.one
❤5
тепер я авто блогер, всьо
🔥11❤2
И так будет со всеми хайпажорами, которые решили из нашей любимой крипты сбежать на медвежке в ИИ
😁4
як вам контент?
🔥11❤5💯2
GPT і Клод скоро будуть по $1к+ Такий прогноз робить YC CEO. Цілком можливо, що ми зараз в моменті, коли frontier models є найдоступнішими. І так як це вікно може проіснувати недовго - важливо працювати одночасно на декількох горизонтах роботи з АІ: 1) перший горизонт - з клауд моделями тестувати гіпотези настільки активно, наскільки це можливо (пізніше такої можливості вже може не бути) 2) другий горизонт - роз…
👍1
🤌🏽Черговий приклад концепту ʼfake it till you make it’ Багато людей в інстаграмі далеко не ті, за кого себе видають. Я знаю десятки історій, коли заходиш в профіль людини, а там Дубай, GT3rs, Richard Miele, хром хартс, і лайфстайл на $150к берна в місяць. А потім дізнаєшся, що це для зйомки від казіно, щоб пропагандувати. Я не засуджую, адже таким чином багато хто «вибився в люди», «зачепився», etc, etc, etc. І це …
❤5🤡1🤣1
😳 Активничаем в кошельке Zodl и лутаем дроп Это независимая организация, занимающаяся разработкой и поддержкой программного обеспечения для экосистемы Zcash. Привлекли инвестиций в размере $25 млн от a16z, Coinbase Ventures, Paradigm и др. Сейчас все, что нам доступно это дэфолт использование без фарма и т.д., но скорее всего это добавят позже, т.к. сейчас около 2,5к пользователей. Ссылка на приложение — ТЫК В пр…
New version is live. The game didn’t wait. The timer is already running 🏪 👇 Open the app. Stay active! @fomorush_bot ↖️ TG Game Bot Website | X | Telegram Chat
🇰🇿 Центральный банк Казахстана стал первым центробанком, купившим биткоин, — глава исследований цифровых активов VanEck.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptokryshtal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КРИ” (@cryptokryshtal), 310 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptokryshtal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.