Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мысли Колхозника🌾

@cryptokolh0znik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

336subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002199189982
TypeChannel
Username@cryptokolh0znik
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 21 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptokolh0znik

Growth

3363403387 August 2026 — 340 subscribers8 August 2026 — 340 subscribers14 August 2026 — 336 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 335–341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:38336-4
8 Aug 2026, 07:02340no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:51340first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.33%
avg views ÷ 336 subscribers
Avg views / post
28.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (21 August 202429 July 2026)
Views total28
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
919.6%
🔥919.6%
👍817.4%
😁48.70%
😭36.52%
🌭24.35%
🍌24.35%
💊24.35%
🙊24.35%
🥰24.35%
😢12.17%
🤝12.17%
🤣12.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2024 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Feb 2025, 18:15 UTC426 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Раздача монет $BBLOK⁉️ Раздача до листинга Именно 😁 на данный момент мы хотим узнать сколько людей заинтесованны в нашей монете, поэтому хотим предложить вам сделку 🤝 Как получить монеты до листинга⁉️ 👉 Все очень легко ваша задача Быть подписанным на наш ТГК. 👉 Быть Активным в нашем Телеграмм канале. (И по возможности приглашать друзей) 👉 Главное условие: Написать свой адрес криптокошелька под данным постом (Обезате

😁2

8 Feb 2025, 22:35 UTC329 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

$FPIBANK видели че сотворил? $UTA - токен от того же создателя, говорят что скоро повторит ту же судьбу, не финанс рекомендация, я купил Ссылка на токен

19 Jan 2025, 22:39 UTC377 viewsread 8 August 2026

Если возьмете - утром проснетесь миллионерами 😎

19 Jan 2025, 22:37 UTC343 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://jup.ag/swap/USDC-FUAfBo2jgks6gB4Z4LfZkqSZgzNucisEHqnNebaRxM1P

19 Jan 2025, 22:36 UTC268 viewsread 8 August 2026

Берите токен жены Трампа пока не поздно 🚬

19 Jan 2025, 20:30 UTC267 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Трампа успели купить?😨

💊2😁2🙊2

29 Nov 2024, 17:39 UTC509 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Постов было маловато в этом месяце, потому что активно воркал и не было желания вести активно канал Воркал только по публичной инфе с тг каналов, вышло 3455$ что считаю очень круто, если кому-то интересно то вот личный пак каналов откуда брал инфу (с некоторым лично знаком, а за некоторыми давно наблюдаю) Кто хочет работать, тот всегда заработает

2👍1

20 Nov 2024, 17:00 UTC496 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Инфополе для выноса бычки на 100к$ ➡️ Лучшая сборка СНГ каналов на 2024, которые суммарно за 2023 год дали заработать комьюнити > 1.5млн$ 🖥 Присоединяйся к новому булрану добавив папку

🤣1

5 Nov 2024, 17:40 UTC578 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, профит за неделю вышел +730$ благодаря этим каналам 😎 Да могло бы быть лучше но на таком рынке вроде бы норм, вот список каналов по мувам которых работал.

2👍2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptokolh0znik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мысли Колхозника🌾” (@cryptokolh0znik), 336 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptokolh0znik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.