Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

💰Crypto Free Signals💰

@cryptokingfreesignals

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

142subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001106396065
TypeChannel
Username@cryptokingfreesignals
DescriptionMake guaranteed 100% profits monthly with our Premium membership. Contact @cryptomaniacc
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 March 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cryptokingfreesignals

Growth

1426 August 2026 — 142 subscribers8 August 2026 — 142 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 141–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:46142no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:54142first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 May 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2019. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
311
Links
330

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2019, 11:44 UTC660 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

What price will BTC hit first?

  1. 14k70%
  2. 12k30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Jun 2019, 10:11 UTC82 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @thedailycryptofeed

#LIBRA COIN Breaking: Facebook Releases Libra Cryptocurrency Whitepaper and Testnet. https://www.ccn.com/?p=185659

18 Jun 2019, 08:56 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026

TRX long term buy signal https://in.tradingview.com/chart/TRXBTC/9lbfiNtF-TRX-BTC-mid-long-term-Signal/

16 Jun 2019, 06:22 UTC44 viewsread 8 August 2026

🏹Swing Trade🏹 #BCD #BitcoinDiamond Buy 136-139 Tg 1 149 Tg 2 159 Tg 3 170 Sl 129

25 May 2019, 17:26 UTC377 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#BRD upcoming projections 🤑🤑🤑💃 Its a whale coin ..highly pumpable coin ..history witnessed its crazy gain.. Thats why we choose this coin Remember our previous coin #HC mooned to pluto🤑 Now its #BRD

25 May 2019, 16:00 UTC287 viewsread 8 August 2026

[~~~~~~🤑🤑🤑🤑~~~~~~] Buy Coin 👉 📍 #BRD📍 #BINANCE ▶️ https://www.binance.com/indexSpa.html#/trade/index?symbol=BRD_BTC ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptokingfreesignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Jul 2019, 11:44 UTCAnonymous Poll76 voters

What price will BTC hit first?

  1. 14k70%
  2. 12k30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2019 to 20 July 2019. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,071,114 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💰Crypto Free Signals💰” (@cryptokingfreesignals), 142 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptokingfreesignals.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.