Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Резюме Рынка

@cryptohub_ai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

801subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001652117623
TypeChannel
Username@cryptohub_ai
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptohub_ai

Growth

801802801.57 Aug 2026, 15:34 — 802 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:35 — 802 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:55 — 801 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:348 Aug 2026, 11:55
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 801–802 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:55801-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:35802no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:34802first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 801 subscribers
Avg views / post
99.2
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 202616 July 2026)
Views total893
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 00s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTC100 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не отработало? Напомню, что #РафаэльСлезыСатоши вроде как ждал Альтсезон вначале 2026 в одном сценарии либо пики в ноябре 2026 во втором сценарии

16 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026

🥵У меня просто НЕТ СЛОВ, когда люди говорят, что индикаторы не работают. Это деревенская позиция. Репутация СНГ инфлов гораздо выше, чем зарубежных. Крупные СНГ инфлы ещё никого не скамили, а стараются дать пользу подписчикам: #PifagorTrade ⚡️Удивляется, что до сих пор есть люди, которые говорят что индикаторы не работают. Он семь лет на своем примере показывает и доказывает, что индикаторы могут работать. Индикатор

15 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC101 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🟢 ⚡️В твиттере среди инфлов консенсус, что принятие Clarity Act будет бычьим сигналом. ⚡️Cенаторы в свою очередь заявляют, что готовы провести этот закон через финишную черту до августовских каникул.

15 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🟢❗️Биткоин достиг 65.000$ несмотря на тряску США И ИРАНА и я собрал для вас локальные прогнозы зарубежных инфлов👇: 🟢#CarlMoon (1.5 млн подписчиков) ⚡️ Мы увидели дно. ТОЛЬКО ВВЕРХ ОТСЮДА! Бычий рынок биткоина начался и он взлетит к небесам 🟢#CryptoCapo (1 млн пдп) ⚡️Крипта готова к ненавистому ралли за долгое время. После достижения 66к будет рост к 82к. 🟢#Gordon (900к пдп) ⚡️ Медведи ждут обвал , а альткоины нах

14 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC100 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Даже ТАК? в твиттере разгоняют кучу подобных картинок. видимо капитуляция по ETH близка

14 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC96 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🛑Пошла ТРЯСКА Некоторые разработчики, участники сообщества, или просто холдеры CHIA теряют веру и продают монеты

14 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC97 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

🥵Страдать по Альтам осталось НЕДОЛГО. Глобально на BTC и Альте формируется дно #PifagorTrade cказал, что рассуждает с точки зрения человека,, который закончил высшую школу экономики Пифагор: "Тот отвратительный бычий рынок альтов, который был в прошлом цикле, не повторится в этом цикле" ⚡️Индикатор деловой активности (ISM) говорит о том в каком состоянии экономика. Сейчас она оживает и для битка это важно. ⚡️Медь

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptohub_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Резюме Рынка” (@cryptohub_ai), 801 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptohub_ai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.