Video message, posted without a caption

Channel
Crypto Guide Sohail
@cryptoguidesohail
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
796subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001242662300 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoguidesohail |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoguidesohail |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 796 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 797 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 802 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:40 | 802 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
BREAKING : Tether's USDT now a recognized virtual asset in Abu Dhabi 🇦🇪 Global Market.
🚀🚀🚀
Bitcoin hits 97,554💥💥 ❓100k by end of the November?👀
- Yes71%
- No32%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🚀
Photo, posted without a caption
BTC BREAKS 87000$
Btc tough $80k 🥳🚀
JUST IN: 🇩🇪 German government's decision to sell 50,000 Bitcoin at $54K cost them $1.1 billion in missed profits.
🚨Scam alert 🚨 this is the fake profile somebody created please report it my profile is @sohailhussain97
https://www.binance.com/en/blog/security/binance-secures-over-$73m-in-funds-stolen-from-external-parties-2430031687623281508?ref=P3W07KOS&utm_source=BinanceLinkedIn&utm_medium=GlobalSocial&utm_campaign=GlobalSocial
BTC crossed 65,000 👆
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptoguidesohail. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Bitcoin hits 97,554💥💥 ❓100k by end of the November?👀
- Yes71%
- No32%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2024 to 29 December 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@cryptoguidesohail named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BinanceCryptoKillers · 59,327
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Guide Sohail” (@cryptoguidesohail), 796 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoguidesohail.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.