Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

КРИПТОФЕР ♚ Криптовалюта

@cryptofers

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

865subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001143663801
TypeChannel
Username@cryptofers
DescriptionЖирный портфель в Криптовалюте. Ивестиции, трейдинг здесь – taplink.cc/cryptofer 👟 Маркетинг - https://cutt.ly/SmXy5Z0
CreatedBetween 1 May 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cryptofers

Growth

8656 Aug 2026, 04:16 — 865 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:35 — 865 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 04:166 Aug 2026, 14:35
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 864–866 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 14:35865no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:16865first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
971
Videos
43
Links
2,590

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

123 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3226.0%
custom 52922510442045210722722.0%
😁2016.3%
😢1512.2%
54.07%
🤩54.07%
😱43.25%
🤔43.25%
🍌21.63%
🍾21.63%
😍21.63%
👀10.813%
👏10.813%
💯10.813%
🙏10.813%
🤯10.813%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 May 2026, 12:27 UTC192 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁5custom 52922510442045210723🔥1

2 May 2026, 07:54 UTC476 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ За P2P c 1 июля 2026 года вводится блокировка платежей, а с 1 июля 2027 года все операции разрешены только через лицензированных посредников. Так как у нас с вами прямые переводы между физлицами (P2P) поэтапно запрещаются в РФ. Теперь на сцену выходят такие сервисы как Алтын. 💳 Алтын — web3-банк на смену P2P Уже можно: 🟠 USDT ⇄ RUB через СБП 🟠 QR-оплата в магазинах из USDT 🟠 Перевод между своими картами 💸 Можно

🔥4🙏1custom 52922510442045210721

11 Apr 2026, 15:00 UTC496 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔴 FreeBitcoin закрывается. На сайте появилось соответствующее объявление, при нажатии на вывод.

😢11😱3🍌2😁1

6 Feb 2026, 16:47 UTC531 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Что происходит?

  1. Медвежка 🐻59%
  2. Очень, при очень глубокая коррекция 😅41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Feb 2026, 08:30 UTC495 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😬Осталось потерпеть совсем не много 💪

😁6😢2custom 52922510442045210722

2 Feb 2026, 07:10 UTC434 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Не такой булран мы ожидали 😄

31 Jan 2026, 10:26 UTC372 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Tether хочет стать «золотым центробанком» Как рассказал глава компании Паоло Ардоино в интервью Bloomberg, сейчас эмитент стейблкоинов покупает по 1-2 тонны золота в неделю и планирует сохранять этот темп как минимум в ближайшие месяцы. Tether уже накопил более 140 тонн золота на $23 млрд (по данным Bloomberg). Это крупнейший известный объём золота среди частных компаний, если не учитывать ETF и коммерческие банки.

🔥3🤩1🤯1😱1

31 Jan 2026, 10:20 UTC271 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Семья Трампа заработала более $1,4 млрд на криптопроектах за 2025 год Это составляет примерно 20% от их общего состояния, которое оценивается в $6,8 млрд. Основной доход пришел от проекта World Liberty Financial и мемкоина президента Трампа. Риски для доходов представляют падение стоимости токенов WLFI (более 90%) и проблемы с медиакомпанией Trump Media & Technology Group. Стоимость активов в WLFI оценивается в $3,

🔥2😢21custom 52922510442045210721

19 Nov 2025, 07:28 UTC492 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🪢 Интересный показатель Сильный страх и жадность, исторически показывает противоположное значение роста или падения цен на рынке. 🤔 А мы сейчас очень близки к максимум страха.

🤔4

31 Oct 2025, 06:58 UTC544 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🪙 Безопасные способы работы с криптой.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptofers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Feb 2026, 16:47 UTCAnonymous Poll49 voters

Что происходит?

  1. Медвежка 🐻59%
  2. Очень, при очень глубокая коррекция 😅41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 29 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 252,524 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КРИПТОФЕР ♚ Криптовалюта” (@cryptofers), 865 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptofers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.