Та я думаю что этим уже половина населения планеты должна пользоваться, всё через чур выглядит топово 😆
🔥6❤1

Channel
@cryptodropstokkii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
430subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002048244853 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptodropstokkii |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptodropstokkii |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 430 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 432 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 431 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 431 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
81 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 32 | 39.5% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 23.5% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 19.8% | |
| custom 5350519289256355751 | 7 | 8.64% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 6.17% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.23% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 11 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Та я думаю что этим уже половина населения планеты должна пользоваться, всё через чур выглядит топово 😆
🔥6❤1
Поменял Юзер, мини-аппка живёт теперь тут: @iqwallet_bot 🥰 Да, правок почти не было. Но зато переезжал на новый юз дольше чем писал всю аппку
👍1
Нужно добрать всего 4 голоса!
Патрик стабильно по 13 звёзд халявных с 1го аккаунта приносит. Действуйте пока дают, если интересно это 🙂
Начал ли ты делать то что было в постах?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Статистика бота по 🪙 $ETH прилагается! +0.5% всего за неделю 😮💨 За год 27% 🤭
❤3🔥1
Настолько весомая персона в мире криптовалюты что после поста волатильность гиганта резко поменялась 🤣
❤3
6% чистыми в год, ещё и цены будут ощущаться как прошлогодние 😶🌫️
❤2
🙂 А вот и самое банальное, но реально работающее получение стабильного дохода 😊 Облигации в Банках, для покупки этих инструментов использую именно Монобанк 🙌 Покупать облигации можно практически везде, даже в “Дія” 🤭 Стабильные 16% годовых - перекроют рост цены на продукты за этот год, ещё и останетесь в плюсе 🤝🤝 Купить можно любое количество, выбираете под себя, все условия прописаны в договорах. Начать можно да…
Целую неделю 💰 $BTC не показывает волатильности, стоит практически на месте У меня бот стоит, негде ему торговать на таком рынке 😁 Чтобы был стабильный доход можно использовать и другой вариант, о котором все знают, но практически никто не использует. Он убивает инфляцию и накидывает пару монет сверху! Миллионов не будет! Может и будет, смотря сколько вы инвестируете 😊 В следующем посте…
🤔5
Сегодня трейд-бот радует. Это мой по 🟠BTC Пробовал кто-то уже?
❤2👍2
https://t.me/patrickstarsfarm В этом канале каждый день дают промокоды на 2 звезды, главное успевать забирать Как ни крути, но с 100 аккаунтов стабильно можно 100-200 звезд в день собирать. За пол года это 20-40к, для мультиаккеров - неплохая жилка 🤓
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptodropstokkii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Начал ли ты делать то что было в постах?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Твой возраст:
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Чем вы сейчас занимаетесь? Свой вариант в комменты
Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 11 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Финансовая База | stokkii” (@cryptodropstokkii), 430 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptodropstokkii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.