Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

✨ щоденник ясочки ✨

@cryptodrftngtalks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

178subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001502642352
TypeChannel
Username@cryptodrftngtalks
Description🔱 Alona Shevchenko (twitter: @cryptodrftng ) 🔱 Co-Founder & Ops Lead of Ukraine DAO (🇺🇦,🇺🇦) 🔱 All links: https://linktr.ee/alona_ukrainedao
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cryptodrftngtalks

Growth

1786 August 2026 — 178 subscribers8 August 2026 — 178 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 177–179 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:31178no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:20178first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,950
Videos
449
Links
3,170

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
37s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1280.0%
🔥16.67%
😁16.67%
🤡16.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Apr 2026, 21:58 UTC142 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

“Протилежність любові – не ненависть, а байдужість. Протилежність мистецтва – не потворність, а байдужість. Протилежність віри – не єресь, а байдужість. І протилежність життя – не смерть, а байдужість.” - Елі Візель #cryptodrftngreads | твіт

2

1 Apr 2026, 01:06 UTC104 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

зараз побачила цей твіт і заплакала.

31 Mar 2026, 21:57 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

те, що я зараз пишу – не хейт і не трансфобія. це матеріал шкільної програми по біології, максимум за 6 клас. мені дуже шкода, що останнім часом на цю тему стільки дебатів, що такі речі доводиться пояснювати дорослим людям.

🔥1

31 Mar 2026, 21:52 UTC82 viewsread 8 August 2026

Як чоловік взагалі може “точно знати”, що він жінка, і як жінка може “точно знати”, що вона чоловік? На випадок, якщо хтось не знає, відповідь на це питання: ✨ніяк✨

31 Mar 2026, 21:50 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

– Зачекай. Як чоловік взагалі може “точно знати”, що він жінка, і як жінка може “точно знати”, що вона чоловік? Чоловік ніколи не був жінкою, а жінка не була чоловіком. Стверджувати протилежне - глибоко образливо як для чоловіків, так і для жінок. Те, що тобі не подобаються люди, які здійснили детранзицію [або передумали робити перехід], жодним чином не робить їхній досвід несправжнім. Це точно не робить їх трансфоб

1

31 Mar 2026, 21:39 UTC75 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

– Чому ти так на неї злишся? – Бо вона поводиться трансфобно. Я не терплю упередженості. – З чого ти це взяв? – Справжні трансгендерні люди не просто “думають”, що вони транс. Вони це точно знають, навіть якщо не можуть пройти операцію через високу ціну. Вони не “граються в це”, як дитина, що грає в “сім’ю“.

31 Mar 2026, 21:34 UTC71 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Shut your bitch-ass up, transphobe. Always coming up with bigoted bullshit. FUCK RIGHT OFF! | tweet

31 Mar 2026, 21:28 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

друзі! сьогодні міжнародний день видимості трансгендерних людей 🏳️‍⚧️ пропоную всім відзначити його переглядом коментарів під 🧵 пані, яка усвідомила, що нею маніпулювали, відмовилась завдавати собі шкоди й не боїться розповідати про свій досвід. [посилання на тред - ось тут] якщо ви колись цікавились темою релігійних сект або, може, навіть самі колись були в секті – ви легко впізнаєте, що там відбувається) p.s. а

🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cryptodrftngtalks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 673,144 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✨ щоденник ясочки ✨” (@cryptodrftngtalks), 178 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptodrftngtalks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.