Channel
@crypto_wrapper
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
813subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001806625002 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_wrapper |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_wrapper |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:39 | 813 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 822 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 820 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:21 | 820 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
65 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 22 | 33.8% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 20.0% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 13.8% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 13.8% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.54% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crypto_wrapper. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 January 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ZAMA - $0,05 Прошло 5 месяцев с момента моего последнего поста о ZAMA Через что прошел токен за это время: > Стейкинг в протоколе токена вырос с 427,58M > 1,6B > Пережил падение BTC на 22% > Заморозка $12M USDC от Circle (разморозили за 1 день через суд) > Найдена уязвимость $ZEC и подрыв доверия ко всей privacy > Делистинг с биржи Coinbase (фьючерсы) > Запустили протокол в сотрудничестве с Morpho За это время то…
👍1
Полностью вышел из DEGENS (POV Market) Ничего интересного они в итоге не представили, для комьюнити никаких ревардов Говорят что-то там будет в будущем, ждите анонсов Пусть этот поезд едет без меня, спасибо что токен дал х2 за это время
👌2
Час назад DEGENS запустили свой предикт маркет Супер ерли вход (1000 пользователей), выглядит интересно Если лидербор и призовой пул в $5000 заходим и разбираемся
🔥5
у тебя есть только один шанс угадать, какую монету из этого списка я держу в портфеле
🔥1😁1
https://app.wall.tg/s/2GBn5GbX Заходи на мою Стену! Оставь пост или нарисуй граффити
👻2❤1
Хакатон для вайбкодеров от Surf с призовым фондом $12,000 Знаю, что многие ушли в ИИ и активно используют vibecoding, поэтому думаю вам будет интересно Любую идею связанную с крипто и он-чейн можно реализовать одним промтом в Surf Studio и это будет рабочая версия сайта без вложений > Регистрируешься в Surf Studio > Забираешь 500 free credits > Начни реализацию с помощью промтов, принцип как в любой ИИ Вот пример…
🔥3👍1
😁😆😁 не забыть сделать пост
😁9
ZAMA PART 2 Знаете ли вы, что основатель Multicoin, Кайл Самани, был главным инициатором роста курса $SOL после краха FTX (с $8 до $250)? Он ушел из Multicoin и сказал, что разочаровался в криптовалютах и Web3 > Он был руководителем институционального маркетинга Solana после ареста SBF > Он рано поддержал BONK (OTC) > Он продвигал Solana в кругах американских знаменитостей Сейчас он поддерживает Zama Все, это по…
🔥2
ZAMA продолжение Внимательно слежу за проектом и что действительно привлекло мое внимание, так это один показатель, который я проверяю каждый день, а именно стейкинг $ZAMA И с каждым днем количество заблокированных токенов продолжает увеличиваться: > Всего застейкано токенов 427,58 млн ZAMA ( на ~$7 млн) > TVL вырос примерно на 70-100% во второй неделе по сравнению с первой > Ежедневный рост ~3-12% от текущего TVL…
🔥3😁3🤡2
Присоединился к Dexari в качестве партнера Вчера получил бейдж в X Считаю это важным этапом в развитии своего бренда Расскажу немного про Dexari Основные преимущества: > Как мобильное торговое приложение, Dexari делает торговлю более удобной и доступной из любого места > Обеспечивает безопасность и прозрачность торговли DEX благодаря интеграции с Hyperliquid > Интерфейс, похожий на CEX, с уровнем безопасности …
👍3✍1💯1
Опубликовал новую статью в X(Twitter) Тема «Есть ли у проекта реальное будущее, или он потерпит неудачу ещё до запуска? (включая тест с шиткоином)» Внутри идет речь о проблемах с которыми сталкиваются проекты до запуска и после, которые не дают им дальше развиваться Так же вы найдете для себя много грин и ред флагов по которым стоит присматриваться к инвестициям в него или к отпработке для получения наград Буду р…
❤4🔥2
Зарегистрируйтесь в первом WL в сети Tempo TepoNFT первый неофициальный проект в тестовой сети Tempo Осталось всего 9 часа для получения WL, поэтому обязательно внимательно выполните следующие действия Как участвовать: > Посетите страницу регистрации: teponft.xyz/tepolist > Получите токены: docs.tempo.xyz/quickstart/faucet > Вы должны выполнить хотя бы одну транзакцию в onchaingm.com > Скопируйте хэш транзакции и…
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypto_wrapper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 897,952 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крипта кормит | AirDrop, NFT, DeFi” (@crypto_wrapper), 813 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_wrapper.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.