Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ❇️Крипто Робин Гуд❇️

Channel

❇️Крипто Робин Гуд❇️

@crypto_sliv_traders

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

616subscribers

-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001710457180
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_sliv_traders
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypto_sliv_traders

Growth

6166646407 August 2026 — 664 subscribers7 August 2026 — 646 subscribers14 August 2026 — 627 subscribers21 August 2026 — 621 subscribers27 August 2026 — 616 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 20 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 609–671 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 04:06616-5
21 Aug 2026, 03:12621-6
14 Aug 2026, 23:56627-19
7 Aug 2026, 23:45646-18
7 Aug 2026, 00:47664first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 12 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

418 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21250.7%
🔥11728.0%
👍399.33%
🤩389.09%
👏122.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 418reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 13:59 UTC414 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Про кошельки Сатоши Накамото и последствия

👏9🔥73

30 Jun 2026, 13:56 UTC421 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лонг лимиты по 1% х5 57100 56100 Стоп 55000 Цель 65000 #олег

16

30 Jun 2026, 13:56 UTC416 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#ETH Лонг лимиты. 1470 1430 по 1% х5 Стоп 1400 Цель 1700 #олег

🔥115👍3

22 Jun 2026, 13:29 UTC438 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#YOUTUBE - https://youtu.be/UYCblJxrXmc Еженедельный обзор рынка. 00:00 Анализ локального тф и глобальный графика, в рамках формирования дна по BTC. В приоритете тест 68-70к перед финальным спуском вниз к 55-52 в рамках кд. 05:00 ETH HYPE LINK (глобальный треугольник) 08:00 TAO AAVE (сетап) AVAX MET EIGEN 11:30 Общие графики Total3 Others Схожие формации с дном 2022. Финальный перелой? Ключевая зона сопротивления 75

🔥137

17 Jun 2026, 18:05 UTC465 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Всем разочарованным и не только. Очередной сеанс психотерапии 💊 Если Илон Маск раздаст свои 1.4 трлн долларов всем людям поровну, то люди станут "богаче" на $170. Представьте силу (денежную массу), которую представляет из себя народ по всему Миру. И насколько успешным будет экспансия доллара, если эти обычные люди по всему Миру будут покупать, даже на небольшую сумму, стейблкоины.

13🔥8

31 May 2026, 07:41 UTC494 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Показываю идею, над которой я сейчас делаю малый разгон. Деп менее 1000$. Вложил в #BNB весь деп 14х. Думал, что еще дадут тройное дно и там сделаю додеп, но монета уже полетела ракетой и нарисовала тройное дно. Короче говоря, тут однозначно лонг, и я наращиваю. Что делать тем, кто не в позиции? Заходить и наращивать без стопов, чтобы не ликвиднуло. Сейчас нормально взять до 5х плечей. Ибо за лой дна тут 18%. Цель ми

19

26 May 2026, 06:59 UTC471 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

TIA - просто машина 💪💪💪

13🔥8

24 May 2026, 04:29 UTC186 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#BTC - По ВТС решил в тексте отдельно ещё раз. Я не знаю что именно сформировали от февраля месяца. Минимальные условия, которые я рассматривал это тест 83-85 в рамках 5-3-5. Увидели. Дальше можем пойти как на 65-50(если была тройка), либо на 90к(если лой был поставлен, к чему я всё больше склоняюсь). Но графически - Равновероятно. 1) https://www.tradingview.com/x/x3iVweB9/ Если нисходящее движение от 83к импульс.

13🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @crypto_sliv_traders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 236,362 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“❇️Крипто Робин Гуд❇️” (@crypto_sliv_traders), 616 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_sliv_traders.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.