Channel
@crypto_pug_bot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
273subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001872040931 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_pug_bot |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_pug_bot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 273 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 274 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 278 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 280 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 281 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 281 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 6 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2025 to 27 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Feb 26 Update: 10 #Bitcoin ETFs NetFlow: -10,938 $BTC(-$951.57M)🔴 #Fidelity outflows 3,908 $BTC($339.97M) and currently holds 200,273 $BTC($17.42B). 9 #Ethereum ETFs NetFlow: -33,793 $ETH(-$81.61M)🔴 #iShares(Blackrock) outflows 18,168 $ETH($43.88M) and currently holds 1,347,901 $ETH($3.26B).
It seems that the $LIBRA and $MELANIA insider team is laundering funds. They spent 19,846 $SOL($2.76M) to buy a memecoin(POPE) with a market cap of less than $150K, and sold it for 175 $SOL($24K), losing $2.73M! That $2.73M was effectively funneled to other wallets in a "legal" manner. https://solscan.io/account/Cbhv3FEDR8fbdKYzUHiYxwHMcixXBvTWtqe4yXjnmuB4#defiactivities
A newly created wallet just withdrew 14.51M $ENA($5.95M) from #Binance. https://etherscan.io/address/0xb7de2d7cb3b2831946f8d5a9d667386c6018b0b4#tokentxns
Whales sold all their $MELANIA holdings at a loss recently! DNTpoX...LN2A spent 30M $USDC to buy 13.97M $MELANIA a month ago, and sold for 14.32M $USDC yesterday, losing $15.68M. Gu2bnm...xmni spent 10M $USDC to buy 6.69M $MELANIA 22 days ago, and sold 6.27M $USDC in the past 2 days, losing $3.73M. https://solscan.io/account/DNTpoX1hpsNUiVZaPrm8toJgVUHmEmEGMzCpqCTDLN2A#defiactivities https://solscan.io/account/Gu2…
A whale unstaked 1,366,028 $SOL($198M) and transferred to #FalconX 7 hours ago. #FalconX has deposited 440,202 $SOL($62.6M) to Binance and Coinbase in the past 7 hours. https://solscan.io/account/5KWidpG1yvXrSSGuyShs3xi7yyNcPueQYuJ52ixKR54c#transfers
Another whale is buying $HYPE. This whale deposited 5M $USDC to #Hyperliquid 6 hours ago, bought 73,959 $HYPE($1.51M) at market prices, and placed a limit order to buy 183,768 $HYPE($3.5M) at $19.04 and $19.05. Currently, this whale holds 999,255 $HYPE ($20.84M). https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x992Ec71207c9e183e64c81461908f1a1a783aF6a
This whale deposited another 2M $USDC to #Hyperliquid to increase his long position in $SOL and increase margin. His liquidation price is currently reduced to $69.42.
Trump's World Liberty(@worldlibertyfi) continues to buy $ETH, spending a total of 48M $USDC to buy 14,403 $ETH at $3,333 in the past 12 hours. https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1880992881164623958
A wallet that had been dormant for 6 years deposited all 500 $BTC ($46.87M) into Coinbase Prime 2 hours ago. This wallet received 500 $BTC 6 years ago when the price of $BTC was $7,059. https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/1KP7X8W77P4r2PjZiFk32nj622saiTpvu9
A whale unstaked 245,922 $SOL($45.85M) and deposited it to #Binance 8 hours ago. https://solscan.io/account/585B7BBbcmYLksPNH7uH3L9wujpgb1MRcKfEEocXQi9W
From a $1M loss (-90%) to a $2.5M profit—this diamond hand has finally claimed victory! 2 months ago, this trader spent 5,441 $SOL($1.15M) to buy 20.46M $pippin, only to watch it drop by 90%. But he didn’t sell. Today, as $pippin broke through a $180M market cap, his 20.46M $pippin is worth $3.68M, with an unrealized profit of more than $2.5M! https://dexscreener.com/solana/8wwcnqdzjcy5pt7akhupafknv2txca9sq6ybkgz…
I have spent 20 hours searching for binance insider wallets/ Not gonna waste more of your time, here is the list: Please like and share :) CWvdyvKHEu8Z6QqGraJT3sLPyp9bJfFhoXcxUYRKC8ou DfMxre4cKmvogbLrPigxmibVTTQDuzjdXojWzjCXXhzj 5q7Xwc2T57sK1DKU6zuwVXvMPsxqB2xrJ3T5AonFYtcY 5CP6zv8a17mz91v6rMruVH6ziC5qAL8GFaJzwrX9Fvup 8xucMh5W5qAgNfpXQ7z8xgs3T5uDrDrtbTSPanhGgBbH 3JPYL9xEPFjefV3tccrUwhLzME1mMq2dQSDeDebgzQi6 EbNr5s54p…
👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @crypto_pug_bot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO PUG” (@crypto_pug_bot), 273 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_pug_bot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.