Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CryptoPropaganda

@crypto_propaganda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002044546652
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_propaganda
DescriptionЧат - t.me/crypto_propaganda_chat
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 5 March 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/crypto_propaganda

Growth

287 August 2026 — 28 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–29 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 06:0028no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:2428first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
14
Videos
3
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆2434.8%
🔥1217.4%
custom 53980409892626949861014.5%
😁68.70%
🐳57.25%
🤯57.25%
🌚34.35%
🤡34.35%
🤔11.45%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2024 to 24 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2024, 20:18 UTC221 viewsread 11 August 2026

Давайте уже деньги! Чекер L3: https://eligibility.layer3foundation.org/

5 Jul 2024, 16:29 UTC244 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://docs.layer3foundation.org/tokenomics Токеномика от Layer3. Мб заряжу еще акков с кубиками под второй сезон, подожду, если легкие квесты еще появятся.

22 Jun 2024, 13:30 UTC169 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Спасибо Вам, мои самые стабильные 50 подписчиков, за то, что остаетесь со мной 😁

🏆5

22 Jun 2024, 13:29 UTC340 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Layer3 - топ для лоубанков Сейчас у них идет кампания Infinity CUBEs. Идти будет еще где-то неделю, ориентируйтесь на этот срок (сейчас не все квесты доступны - 25/30). На этот ивент выделено 500.000$ и токены L3. Нужно собрать 1/2/3 Бесконечных кубика. Скорее всего, как токены, так и деньги поделят в каком-то соотношении, а третий куб получит больше всего. Выйти обещали как раз после второго сезона, то есть когда

custom 53980409892626949864

12 Jun 2024, 18:45 UTC80 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ten_gweiPhoto

«Новое дно» ZkSync ScamERA. Самый большой Airdrop SCAM в крипте. Думаю, не для кого не новость, что команды через дроп раздают токены себе. ZkSync пошли в этом вопросе дальше всех. Но, в отличии от вышеупомянутой команды, блокчейн прозрачен и всё "помнит". Разберём данные DeFiLama по TVL в сети ZkSync. Именно за ликвидность этот проект и раздал сумасшедшие аллокации в 100к токенов, хотя это л2 блокчейн, а не проток

11 Jun 2024, 07:44 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Оставлю этот endgame без комментариев 😁

🤔1

2 May 2024, 00:10 UTC164 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

https://twitter.com/LayerZero_Labs/status/1785821562475839843 Это то, что мы все так давно ждали. Первый чекпоинт пройден, осталось дождаться заветного "eligible" и наконец разбогатеть. Альфа-поведение. Сделали - сказали, как и было обещано. Ждем следующего этапа. 📣 BULLISH📣

🏆2🔥1🤯1

7 Apr 2024, 14:31 UTC152 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Прости меня, мой единственный самый преданный Подписчик. В общем, эти пару недель были конкретно продуктивные, с компа практически не вставал, а надо еще как-то с учебой это совмещать, будь она не ладна. Поэтому и постов нет, потому что реально нет времени писать, последнюю неделю вообще всю посвятил Linea. В совокупности должно получиться хххххх LXP (на одном аккаунте, естественно) после рассылки. Насыпку ожидаем +

🏆6🌚3😁2🤡1

14 Mar 2024, 23:59 UTC164 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Пока постов нет, делайте Линею. Я пока загоняю Твитеры и почты для POH'a, делать буду, когда апдейт будет и комиссии упадут. Обещали, что в течение пары недель после эфировской обновы. Пока самый прозрачный проект под дроп из того, что еще не поздно делать, на мой взгляд. КОЛ БЫЛ ДАН

custom 53980409892626949866

14 Mar 2024, 23:05 UTC139 viewsread 11 August 2026

Пацаны, хотел Вас чуть полезными постами забросать, но щас реально минуты нет свободной, постараюсь в начале апреля дропнуть хороший постик

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @crypto_propaganda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoPropaganda” (@crypto_propaganda), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_propaganda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.