Channel
@crypto_labirinth
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002419891862 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_labirinth |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 14 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_labirinth |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 5 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 6 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @crypto_labirinth/13 · this entry14 Oct 2024, 07:49 UTC | @dvizheniye_treyda/1214 Oct 2024, 07:49 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @crypto_labirinth/15 · this entry17 Oct 2024, 09:32 UTC | @dvizheniye_treyda/1417 Oct 2024, 09:32 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @crypto_labirinth/17 · this entry18 Oct 2024, 08:29 UTC | @dvizheniye_treyda/1618 Oct 2024, 08:29 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @dvizheniye_treyda/1723 Oct 2024, 12:43 UTC | @crypto_labirinth/18 · this entry23 Oct 2024, 12:43 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @dvizheniye_treyda/2229 Oct 2024, 12:29 UTC | @crypto_labirinth/23 · this entry29 Oct 2024, 12:29 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @crypto_labirinth/27 · this entry8 Nov 2024, 09:19 UTC | @dvizheniye_treyda/278 Nov 2024, 09:19 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @dvizheniye_treyda | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (17–0) |
| @crypto_risky | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (17–0) |
| @cryptto_signaly | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @cryptto_signaly (17–0) |
| @scalper_crypto | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @scalper_crypto (12–5) |
| @cryptovaluty_channel | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @cryptovaluty_channel (17–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 46 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 October 2024 to 11 December 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 6 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @crypto_risky. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 6 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 2 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Владельцы Redmi K80, защитите свой телефон прямо сейчас! Улучшите устройство с нашим закалённым стеклом с гальваническим покрытием: Чёткое изображение: Сохраняет яркость и насыщенность цветов экрана. Простая установка: В комплекте есть инструмент для идеального нанесения без пузырей. Гладкое касание: Наслаждайтесь плавностью и быстрой реакцией сенсора. Прочность и защита: Оберегает экран от царапин и ежедневного изн…
Экономический рост России в последние годы был весьма нестабильным, что в значительной степени обусловлено колебаниями мировых цен на нефть и газ, а также международными санкциями. В 2014 году, вследствие кризиса на Украине, Россия подверглась экономическим санкциям со стороны западных стран, что привело к значительному экономическому спаду. В последние годы экономика России в некоторой степени начала восстанавливать…
💵Курс доллара в течение следующих 12 месяцев вырастет еще примерно 10%, - НБУ То есть, через год будет 44-45 гривен. 💸
🔮 Сегодня все криптаны вспоминают сон легенды NBA Скотти Пиппена — в сентябре, с его слов, к нему во сне пришел Сатоши Накамото и нашептал, что 5 ноября 2024 года Bitcoin достигнет $84 650. Тогда, при цене BTC $58 000, это воспринималось как безумие, но в итоге Скотти ошибся всего на несколько дней. 💸Опять Крипта
🐤Цена SOL достигла $200 впервые с марта этого года. Капитализация актива обновила исторический максимум на уровне $94 млрд. Также исторического максимума достигло и доминирование SOL в общей рыночной капитализации (3,74%). 💸
🤑В данный момент 100% холдеров биткоина находятся в плюсе по текущим ценам. 💸
📈BTC всегда рос после президентских выборов в США в 2012, 2016 и 2020 гг, — Coindesk. Если история повторится, то аналитики ожидают увидеть курс BTC выше $100 000 в 2025 году. Другие аналитики, на этот раз из Bernstein, выкатили очередной прогноз по BTC в преддверии выборов — они прогнозируют краткосрочное падение биткоина до $50 000 в случае победы Камалы Харрис, а также рост курса до $80 000–90 000 в случае побед…
📊На фоне роста BTC к $73 000 индекс страха и жадности достиг 77 пунктов, сигнализируя об экстремальной жадности на рынке. Не удивительно, ведь 100% держателей BTC вчера находились в плюсе. 💸
💵 CEO Tether признает, что правительство США может запросто уничтожить Tether, если захочет. Tether не намерен воевать с США и не находится под их следствием, а публикация WSJ - безответственная, высказался CEO Tether на фоне FUDa вокруг компании. Компания предпринимает все возможное для борьбы с отмыванием денег и незаконными транзакциями, активно сотрудничает с ФБР, Минюстом США и другими правоохранительными орга…
🌐Google разрабатывает ИИ-помощника Jarvis для браузера Chrome — технология сможет самостоятельно выполнять различные задачи в браузере, например делать покупки, бронировать билеты или искать необходимую информацию. Релиз запланирован на декабрь 2024 года. 💸Опять Крипта
🇺🇸У правительства США украли $20 миллионов в крипте, такую информацию распространяют Arkham и другие аналитические компании. $20 миллионов в USDC, USDT, aUSDC и ETH перемещены на подозрительные кошельки. По словам аналитиков хакер уже начал продажу криптовалюты. 💸Опять Крипта
⚡️ Квартальный отчет Tesla показал, что компания продолжает удерживать принадлежащие ей биткоины — на балансе хранится 11 509 BTC на сумму $773 млн, которые раскиданы по новым кошелькам. 💸Опять Крипта
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypto_labirinth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крипто Лабиринт 🌀” (@crypto_labirinth), 2 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_labirinth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.