Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Криптокурс

@crypto_informator

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

281subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001379498353
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_informator
DescriptionКурсы криптовалют и новости для трейдеров и инвесторов
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/crypto_informator

Growth

2817 Aug 2026, 04:09 — 281 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:17 — 281 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:097 Aug 2026, 04:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 280–282 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 04:17281no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:09281first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.712%
avg views ÷ 281 subscribers
Avg views / post
2.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held19 (7 April 202629 July 2026)
Views total2
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,360
Links
72

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Криптан заработал $27,5 млн долларов с $200 тысяч благодаря сверхвысокому плечу, а потом всего за месяц потерял почти всё.

5 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

2 человека вложили $10,000 в разную крипту 10 лет назад Один инвестировал в BTC и сегодня его капитал составляет $640,000. Второй выбрал ETH и его инвестиция сейчас стоит $2,17 млн. Одна сумма, один срок, но результат 64x против 217x.

9 Jun 2026, 12:25 UTC7 viewsread 7 August 2026

коррекция на фондовом рынке США Под конец прошлой недели S&P снизился на 3%, Nasdaq на 5%. Основная причина - сильный рынок труда. В мае экономика США создала почти в 2 раза больше рабочих мест, чем ожидали, и на этом фоне рынок снова начал бояться более жесткой политики ФРС. Плюс нефть высокая, а значит снова разговоры про инфляцию В итоге сейчас рынок уже закладывает даже не снижение, а повышение ставки на 0.25%

8 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC7 viewsread 7 August 2026

Криптобизнесмена Арута Назаряна в ОАЭ приговорили к двум годам тюрьмы и штрафу в 200 млн дирхамов (4 млрд рублей) — за управление криптобиржей без лицензии. По данным СМИ, штраф посчитали как общий объем торгов на площадке, а сам Назарян уже почти полгода находится в заключении.

8 Jun 2026, 09:14 UTC9 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$15 000 из-за ошибки в тату на лбу Парень из Индии согласился набить на лбу татуировку с названием криптопроекта "Bountywork" за вознаграждение в $2 400. Проблема лишь в том, что бедняге неправильно написали слово, пропустив букву N. Из-за ошибки организаторы отказались выплачивать деньги, и индус остался и без средств, и с татуировкой на лбу на всю жизнь. Но криптосообщество решило, что такая история заслуживает х

16 May 2026, 12:26 UTC11 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если бы вы вложили $10 000 в эти активы в день вступления Трампа в должность президента, то сегодня ваши инвестиции стоили бы: Серебро — $25 028 Золото — $16 799 Nasdaq — $13 360 S&P 500 — $12 354 Russell 2000 — $12 273 Bitcoin — $7 593

10 May 2026, 06:50 UTC9 viewsread 7 August 2026

Инвестировать в LEGO оказалось выгоднее, чем в золото, крипту или акции. Экономисты подсчитали, что наборы конструктора в среднем приносили около 11% годовых за последние 30 лет. Некоторые наборы подорожали в десятки раз: например, Cafe Corner за $140 в 2007 году сегодня стоит более $3000. Сильнее всего растут серии Star Wars, Harry Potter и Batman: цены на них взлетают более чем на 400%. Секрет — в ограниченном вып

28 Apr 2026, 15:19 UTC11 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BTC < 76k и фонда пошла на неплохую коррекцию — уже минус 500 млрд капы за час Тем временем Axios пишут, что Трамп сейчас колеблется между возобновлением боевых действий в Иране и стремлением добиться нужного себе решения через санкции. А американские чиновники опасаются того, что ситуация идёт к фактическому замораживанию конфликта и превращению противостояния в санкционную «холодную войну» с перехватами судов и «

27 Apr 2026, 12:27 UTC6 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ETH-season — стреляют не только щитки, но и NFT Тем временем цена эфира: • 26 апреля 2021 — $2,328 • 27 апреля 2026 — $2,328

24 Apr 2026, 11:56 UTC8 viewsread 7 August 2026

Что с USD/RUB? Вот уже больше года рубль остается аномально сильным. И глобально мое мнение не меняется: долгосрочно доллар будет сильно выше. Но сегодня хочется поговорить именно про среднесрочную картину Примерно месяц назад доллар резко выстрелил и прибавил больше 10% от локальных минимумов. Тогда этому помогло сразу несколько факторов: зимой из-за низких цен на нефть в страну поступало меньше валюты, Минфин сок

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @crypto_informator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,243,254 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Криптокурс” (@crypto_informator), 281 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_informator.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.