Channel
@crypto_if
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
317subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001140388755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_if |
| Description | Канал делового журнала "Инвест-форсайт" о новых бизнес-трендах в России и мире. Контакты: @comif24 |
| Created | 19 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_if |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @startupnews_if/24137 May 2026, 13:19 UTC | @crypto_if/2642 · this entry7 May 2026, 13:19 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @startupnews_if | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @startupnews_if (4–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @startupnews_if. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 317 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 317 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 April 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 102 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Импортозамещение в агропромышленном секторе перестало быть просто антикризисной мерой — сегодня это базовый уровень, от которого отрасль должна оттолкнуться, чтобы выйти на новый виток развития. Эксперт в области селекции и агротехнологий Григорий Кухаренко уверен: опасность текущей повестки — свести всю работу к латанию «импортных дыр», не задаваясь вопросом, останутся ли импортозамещенные продукты и технологии конк…
Пожар в одном конкретном лесу может обнулить углеродный проект, под который компания годами закладывала посадки и отчетность. Еще недавно такой сценарий казался экзотикой для риск-менеджера, теперь же климат вошел в графу корпоративных рисков наравне с валютным курсом и ставкой ЦБ, а лес из благотворительного «зеленого фона» превратился в актив, который приносит деньги и репутацию одним, а другим стоит потерянного ка…
Еще пару лет назад разговоры о том, что нейросети заменят риелторов, казались скорее футуристическим сценарием. Сегодня вопрос звучит иначе: какие задачи искусственный интеллект (ИИ) уже способен выполнять лучше и быстрее человека? «Ответ оказался неожиданным, — рассказывает Виктор Зубик, основатель управляющей компании Smarent. — ИИ пока не умеет проводить сложные переговоры, чувствовать мотивацию клиента или брать…
В феврале 2026 года Совет Европейского союза принял пакет Omnibus и разом сократил охват обязательной отчетности об устойчивом развитии и регуляторную нагрузку. Формально это выглядит как отступление, будто регуляторы разочаровались в самой идее. На деле произошло обратное. Андрей Хорошилов, основатель экосервиса «Сохрани лес», объясняет, почему упрощение правил не отменяет практику, а закрепляет ее: как ESG (экологи…
Когда государство выходит на рынок не как регулятор, а как крупный покупатель квартир, это может серьезно повлиять на цены и доступность жилья — особенно в небольших городах. Предприниматель, эксперт по электронным торгам и автор программы «Про Торги» Дмитрий Кивелёв объясняет, почему закупки по 44-ФЗ нередко формируют отдельный сегмент рынка, из-за чего даже при наличии финансирования государство не всегда может пр…
После девятнадцати недель снижения индекс Мосбиржи сначала опустился ниже 1900 пунктов, а затем всего за несколько дней вырос более чем на 12%. Но означает ли это начало устойчивого восстановления? Финансист, кандидат экономических наук Кирилл Кучинский объясняет, почему высокая ключевая ставка продолжает давить на рынок, а дивиденды перестали поддерживать акции, какую роль сейчас играет геополитика и стоит ли инвес…
После недавних атак беспилотников на склады крупного маркетплейса вопрос страхования имущества предприятий стал особенно актуальным. Однако наличие полиса еще не гарантирует получение компенсации. Основатель и генеральный директор страхового агрегатора INFULL Андрей Креер объясняет, почему ключевую роль играют юридическая квалификация происшествия и формулировки договора, какие риски чаще всего не покрываются станда…
К 2026 году правовое регулирование рекламы трансформировалось настолько глубоко, что косметическими правками в договорах бизнесу уже не обойтись. Федеральная антимонопольная служба и Роскомнадзор окончательно отказались от практики точечных проверок по жалобам, переведя надзор в режим непрерывного автоматизированного сканирования. Цифровые алгоритмы ведомств круглосуточно анализируют контент на предмет отсутствующих …
Ввод стоек дата-центров в России упал с 14 тысяч в 2024 году до 5 тысяч в 2025-м, окупаемость выросла с 6–8 до 10–12 лет, а Москва запретила строительство новых ЦОД из-за энергодефицита — такие данные приводит «Коммерсантъ». Большинство восприняло это как новость про IT-рынок, но ЦОД первым обнажил то, что давно происходит со всей коммерческой недвижимостью: метр без ресурса перестает быть продуктом. Почему объекты с…
Продажа бизнеса — это не только поиск покупателя и согласование цены. На практике собственники нередко сталкиваются с тем, что потенциальные инвесторы относятся к сделке с недоверием. Логика проста: если бизнес успешен и приносит прибыль, зачем его продавать? Именно поэтому подготовка компании к продаже должна начинаться задолго до выхода на рынок, считает Максим Чайка, управляющий юридической компании «НЕВАПРАВО». Ч…
Цифровизация экономики ставит новые задачи перед экономической наукой, которая должна принимать во внимание новые ранее не имевшие значение факторы. О качественных изменениях в экономике и новых задачах экономистов на фоне возникновения экономики данных побеседовали с доктором экономических наук, профессором кафедры управления бизнес-проектами НИЯУ МИФИ Виктором Абрамовым.
По оценке McKinsey, к 2030 году автоматизация может вытеснить до 800 млн рабочих мест, а эксперименты с безусловным базовым доходом от Кении до Германии показывают: люди не бросают трудиться, когда получают деньги без условий. Мир движется к состоянию, в котором зарабатывать на жизнь будет не обязательно, — и главный вопрос не в том, наступит ли этот момент, а в том, приведет ли он к свободе или к новому виду зависим…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypto_if. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 323,291 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новые бизнес-тренды” (@crypto_if), 317 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_if.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.