Channel
@crypto_horizon
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
5subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001428556441 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_horizon |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_horizon |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 5 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 14 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @CryptoNewsScooper/6268012 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC | @crypto_horizon/170619 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC | 1.00 | 11 hours |
| @CryptoNewsScooper/6268112 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC | @crypto_horizon/170620 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC | 1.00 | 11 hours |
| @CryptoNewsScooper/6268212 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC | @crypto_horizon/170621 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC | 1.00 | 11 hours |
| @CryptoNewsScooper/6268412 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC | @crypto_horizon/170623 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC | 1.00 | 7.6 hours |
| @CryptoNewsScooper/6268512 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC | @crypto_horizon/170624 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC | 1.00 | 7.6 hours |
| @CryptoNewsScooper/6268712 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC | @crypto_horizon/170625 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC | 1.00 | 6.1 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @CryptoNewsScooper | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 7.6 hours | @CryptoNewsScooper (9–0) |
| @PhloxcoinNews | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 7.2 hours | @PhloxcoinNews (7–0) |
| @bixnews | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 10 hours | @bixnews (6–0) |
| @cryptonewsindonesia1 | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 71 minutes | this entry (5–0) |
| @gravychain | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 22 of the 22 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 12 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 14 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @bitcoinchannel. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 14 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 07:06 | 5 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 6 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 6 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Slovenia joins EU’s MiCA stablecoin register with first issuer https://cointelegraph.com/news/slovenia-eu-mica-stablecoin-register-dinaro?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
El Salvador’s Bitcoin experiment turns 5: ‘It was for us, not them’ https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/el-salvadors-bitcoin-experiment-turns-5-it-was-for-us-and-not-them?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
Wintermute to pour $1B into AI, high-frequency trading amid TradFi expansion: Report https://cointelegraph.com/news/wintermute-pour-1b-ai-tradfi-expansion-report?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
Fidelity files with SEC to add staking to Ethereum ETF https://cointelegraph.com/news/fidelity-staking-ethereum-etf-sec-filing?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
Binance, RedotPay clash over fate of Singapore lawsuit https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-redotpay-clash-singapore-lawsuit?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
Bitcoin miners earn under 0.7% of revenue from fees in new 10-year low https://cointelegraph.com/markets/bitcoin-miners-earn-under-07-of-revenue-from-fees-in-new-10-year-low?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
Crypto companies urge AI firms to give Bitcoin developers early access https://cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-companies-ai-firms-bitcoin-developers-access?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
Inside the fake crypto startup that fooled North Korean IT workers https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/fake-crypto-startup-fooled-north-korean-it-workers?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
Harmony considers rollback after suspected exploit inflates ONE supply https://cointelegraph.com/news/armony-rollback-alleged-one-token-mint?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
CFTC invokes emergency powers to keep Kalshi operating in New York fight https://cointelegraph.com/news/cftc-kalshi-emergency-order-new-york-lawsuit?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
Ravencoin hits record low as network exploit puts transactions at risk https://cointelegraph.com/markets/ravencoin-rvn-record-low-consensus-exploit?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
SEC, CFTC sue Goliath Ventures over $400M crypto Ponzi scheme https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-cftc-sue-goliath-ventures-400m-crypto-ponzi?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypto_horizon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Horizon” (@crypto_horizon), 5 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_horizon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.