The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
Кри, что? Крипта.
@crypto_cherewnya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
45subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001610245727 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_cherewnya |
| Description | Крипто еда - которая захотела стать крутым хищником. Темы для lоw банков, ресерчи, участие в амбах, абуз и флипы на пирожки с лимонами Биг босс - @cherewnyaq Чат - http://t.me/+sqMsbGPoBC04Mzdi |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 23 April 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_cherewnya |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 45 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 45 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 23 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 26
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 27
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 37s
- Average length
- 49s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
42 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 9.52% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 7.14% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 7.14% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2022 to 14 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
отписывайтесь але
😢1
Signed cherewnya
Ого, у меня канал есть
👍3
Signed cherewnya [в био номер доры]
Извините, я не могу это не запостить Upd by 17 мая: ниче не обещаю Upd by 30 мая: каминг сун
👍7😁2
Signed cherewnya [в био номер доры]
Откуда на Луну готовилось нападение и как слили UST Почитайте 🙌
🤔3🤬1😁1
Signed cherewnya [в био номер доры]
Единственный пост про луну P.s. сегодня скину номера дурок
Signed cherewnya [в био номер доры]
4 всадника апокалипсиса Всем ку, я относительно сегодня начал активно следить за тем, что происходит в крипте и чу-чуть удивляюсь. Очень интересно наблюдать за такими событиями (буду хомячкам маленьким рассказывать) Лично я в данный момент нахожусь на чилл моде (у меня огэ через 10 дней по математике). В плане ворка ничего не буду обещать, писать, просто скажу что буду заниматься собой и своими знаниями. Всем гл, к…
Signed cherewnya [в био номер доры]
В общем меня забайтили копать грядки, что-то писать адекватное не могу, времени не оч много Сейчас чищу свое инфополе (ибо уведы на 60 каналах - такое себе), думаю насчёт темок вне крипты (я у мамы схемер), думаю насчёт темок в крипте (думать слабо получается, все денюжки в рублях, не прикольно) и просто адыхаю😎 Пэ эс: пейте сок добрый манго, реально имба
❤4
Signed cherewnya [в био номер доры]
Мега сорян за отсутствие ещё раз, чота прошло лежал, смотрел раст, гулял, слушал депутатов:)) Крипто гений скинул деньги за кристаллы генопетс, 18500₽, но уже осталось 17500. На какую-то сумму куплю себе приколюх, остальное в ворк. Не буду ничо обещать, просто скажу шо начал ворк (потому что все видосы по расту посмотрел)
👍2
Signed cherewnya [в био номер девочки]
Рубим говно (build tower) на корню👍 И так, всем привет, пока темок для лоубанков в крипте не наблюдаю, решил сделать аларм пост по поводу пирамиды Сегодня в 10:00 по МСК открылась новая пирамидка build tower и купила реклы в ± крупном канале, в добавок крутит комменты про то что пирамида топ, но попутно удаляет негативные, дефолт кароче https://t.me/Pro_Blockchain/19506 Вывод: не лезьте в эту хуйню, если у вас нет…
👍5
Signed cherewnya [в био номер девочки]
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @crypto_cherewnya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,261,899 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@crypto_cherewnya named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кри, что? Крипта.” (@crypto_cherewnya), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_cherewnya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.