Channel
@crypto_ai_rabotyaga
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
114subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002919861891 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_ai_rabotyaga |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 17 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_ai_rabotyaga |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 114 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 117 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 118 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 119 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 123 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 123 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 31.6% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 31.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2025 to 17 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет) Даня на связи 😌 Вот и пока что теряю денежки. Или не теряю. Дело в том, что я в этом ничего не понимаю. Поэтому, они просто лежат и все Но выхожу с еженедельной статистикой к Вам 😌
❤2
Всем привет, это Даня! 👋🏼 Много работы, я не успеваю особо залетать сюда, писать. Но вот показываю. На прошлой неделе не писал и не заходил. На этой ситуация выглядит вот так. Из того, что можно заметить - чистая сумма копирования с 400 или 500$ выросла до 731$, а по деньгам на кошеле моем злачном стало не сильно больше. Посмотрим, что дальше 😌 Всем хорошего и продуктивного дня)
❤2
Летим в пропасть. За час ликвидировало лонгов на $600 млн.
😭1😱1
31 октября - день White Paper BTC цена BTC в этот день: 2010: $0.20 2011: $3.27 2012: $11 2013: $201 2014: $337 2015: $312 2016: $699 2017: $6,369 2018: $6,332 2019: $9,172 2020: $13,537 2021: $61,837 2022: $20,624 2023: $34,494 2024: $72,250 2025: $110,000 💸 Статистика бота 💸 Binance копитрейдинг 💬 Блог работяги
❤1
#криптоюмор 💸 Статистика бота 💸 Binance копитрейдинг 💬 Блог работяги
🤝 #криптоюмор 💸 Статистика бота 💸 Binance копитрейдинг 💬 Блог работяги
😁2🔥1
Крипта льется, но работяга чтото успел подобрать. Надеемся на восстановление активности на рынке, но пока-что перспективы - это поход битка в сторону 100к 💸 Статистика бота 💸 Binance копитрейдинг 💬 Блог работяги
👍2🔥2❤1
Судя по всему Chat GPT решил окончательно разогнать депозит =) 💸 Статистика бота 💸 Binance копитрейдинг 💬 Блог работяги
Всем привет! 👋 Что могу сказать: На этой неделе вообще не следил за этой историей, потому что было банально некогда. Сейчас зашел, чтобы написать пост Вам и показать, как дела там у моих копеечек 😄 Скажу так, если на след неделе останется на этом же уровне или даже чуть вырастет, на 5 баксов к примеру, я уже буду доволен:) Желаю всем прекрасного дня! 😊
Криптотрейдинг перешёл ИИ 🤖 В рамках эксперимента AI Trading Showdown от nof1.ai шесть ИИ-моделей (Grok4, DeepSeek, GPT, Claude и другие) торгуют криптой на реальные $10 000. Grok4 сделал хедж-фонд нервным — за день показал +500%. Сейчас в топе DeepSeek. 💸 Статистика бота 💸 Binance копитрейдинг 💬 Блог работяги
👍2
Пойдем ли в этот раз собирать так же ликвидность? Сейчас по фьючам ситуация полностью противоположная двум неделям назад — если цена BTC пойдет в район $124k, можем собрать ликвидности на $18 млрд в шортах. 💸 Статистика бота 💸 Binance копитрейдинг 💬 Блог работяги
Минус ещё $13 миллионов для Джеймса Уинна 🤣 Трейдера, известного своими рискованными ставками, снова ликвидировало — теперь на мем-коине PEPE. Сообщество уже окрестило его «вторым Джимом Крамером». От миллиардных позиций остались только убытки. Что там по его прогнозам - посмотрим завтра 🫠 💸 Статистика бота 💸 Binance копитрейдинг 💬 Блог работяги
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @crypto_ai_rabotyaga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
2 URLs this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блог Работяги | Крипта | Копитрейдинг” (@crypto_ai_rabotyaga), 114 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_ai_rabotyaga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.