Channel
@crypti_ua
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
272subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001865145382 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypti_ua |
| Description | 💢Якщо не заходить з ТТ, натискайте три крапки та відкрити у браузері💢 Тут я розписую свої думки з приводу різних активностей, аналізую та шукаю всю інфу для вас)🧠 В крипті вже 3 роки)🧐 Всі потрібні посилання — @bodya_worker Зв'язок — @bohdan0904 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypti_ua |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 272 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 272 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
138 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 37.7% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 23.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 7.97% | |
| custom 5391019924619541244 | 9 | 6.52% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 5.80% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 3.62% | |
| custom 5391173727398409767 | 3 | 2.17% | |
| custom 5773770578062216835 | 3 | 2.17% | |
| 👨💻 | 3 | 2.17% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.17% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 2.17% | |
| custom 5832384984593206481 | 2 | 1.45% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.45% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.45% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сьогодні мені 19 років…🐷 Ну що сказати, keep fckn working… А так не забувайте що все ж таки ми живемо життя, не потрібно жити тільки для досягнення успіху, кайфуйте)🥰 Немає більше чого розумного тут написати, всього на всього 19 років.🐶🐶🐶
❤8🎉3🔥3
А бля, в мене ж канал є
🔥2😁2
💸Отримуємо 300грн + 300грн за друга від Raiffeisen Bank Raiffeisen Bank — та пофік що це за банк, крипта не годує, лутаємо гроші від банків. 📝Інструкція: 🛑Завантажуємо додаток MyRaif за посиланням 🛑Проходимо швидку реєстрацію через «Дія»🔥 🛑Відкриваємо віртуальну картку АТБ 🛑Потім в розділі «Кешбек» чекаємо на 300грн 💎Нагорода: 300грн + 300грн за кожного друга 🕔Дедлайн: 10 березня 🐒Крипта їсти не дає,…
🔥2custom 53910199246195412441custom 53911737273984097671custom 58323849845932064811
📈НАРЕШТІ BYBIT ГОДУЄ Bybit — раніше годував нас файно, зараз де кого досі файно годує! 📝Інструкція: 🛑Переключаємо на англійську мову сайт 🛑Переходимо в «Rewards Hub» 🛑Робимо депозит в 100$ та закидуємо його на Trade-Fi рахунок 🛑Холдимо його 3 дня 💎Нагорода: 10$ 🕔Дедлайн: 27 лютого 🔴Також якщо вже депаєте, можете виконати завдання ось в цьому промо, може випасти до 100$! Мита Трампа визнали незаконни…
🔥2😱1custom 57737705780622168351custom 58323849845932064811
Як ви? Як ваші портфелі? Я маю майже все в USDT) Сиджу і дивлюся на це кіно і німців.🍴 Дай боже щоб демократи в кінці року вигнали цього діда!🙏 ✈️Кріпті🍉Чат✌️
😢2❤1🔥1😁1custom 53910199246195412441
Є тут взагалі хтось, хто цікавиться крипто Твітером?🕊 Бо це наразі річ в якій я шарю і проводжу багато часу, міг би писати пости з цього приводу для вас, але чи є тут ті хто якось його розвиває або щось то там і поробляє? Якщо ні, то запропонуйте свій напрямок яким займаєтесь в коментах, просто цікаво почути ваші думки... ✈️Кріпті🍉Чат✌️
❤4👨💻2🫡2😱2
https://op.xyz/collectibles/41c745ab-fee6-4324-8bf5-ff893ba98758 можете в АпеЧейн замінтити аватар для персонажа в OtherSide, можливо навіть щось буде коштувати комса 1.5 APE, в кого немає кидайте в чат гаманець
custom 53910199246195412442❤1custom 57737705780622168351
Вітаю @sania21011 з виграшом!💵💵💵 Напиши мені в особисті номер своєї карти) Ну шо, завтра вже новий рік, там буду постити всяке, питати вас, а поки бажаю вам приємно провести новий рік!🫶 ✈️Кріпті🍉Чат✌️
❤3custom 53910199246195412443🐳2🔥1
💵100 ГРН нікому не треба?
❤3
Вітаю всіх з минувшим Різдвом!🎁 Дякую всім за донати, будь яка сума важлива! (якщо що збір ще триває, хто хоче може задонатити) А ось і переможці розіграшу: @Taapaak @farrusgay @recromc0 Вибачаюсь що трохи затягнув з результатами... Тому в знак вибачення серед коментаторів які залишать під цим постом «+» розіграю 100грн)💵 ✈️Кріпті🍉Чат✌️
❤3🔥3custom 53911737273984097672
👀Всього 5 учасників а призів 3! (до кінця розіграшу не так вже й багато часу) 🖖Сприймайте це в першу чергу як допомогу військовим. 🫡Війна продовжується, військові тримають фронт, а нам потрібно продовжувати їм допомагати!
❤3🔥2❤🔥1
👋Ще сьогодні у організатора збору день народження! А найкраще привітання це донат!!!
❤3🔥2🫡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypti_ua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Який у вас банк?💳
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 9 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 696,017 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кріпті🇺🇦” (@crypti_ua), 272 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypti_ua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.