Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for circus in crypto🎪

Channel

circus in crypto🎪

@cryptcircus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

259subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002281451316
TypeChannel
Username@cryptcircus
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptcircus

Growth

259262260.57 August 2026 — 262 subscribers8 August 2026 — 262 subscribers16 August 2026 — 259 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 259–262 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 14:12259-3
8 Aug 2026, 09:04262no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:28262first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7866.7%
custom 53732235944845871361311.1%
custom 5355294343701747258119.40%
custom 537529358403766578497.69%
custom 523816868716427994865.13%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 28 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptcircus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 August 2025 to 28 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jan 2026, 10:52 UTC188 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Давно меня тут не было, но зато я все время была тут @MidChart Кто скучал по моим длинным, нудным текстам и анализу - заходите Чет как то не было сил вести два канала, но каюсь, поступила по свински, сменив болото не сообщив вам 🐖

custom 53732235944845871363

28 Jan 2026, 10:51 UTC178 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Шо вы братики, как жизнь?)

custom 53732235944845871365custom 52381686871642799483

11 Oct 2025, 13:09 UTC449 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пизда… Вот так вот просыпаешься и узнаешь, что на одну легенду стало меньше Из жизни ушел Константин Ганич (Kudo), одним днем не стало человека на чьи сетапы я равнялась, благодаря которому я многому училась Не могу поверить в это, просто не могу, огромные соболезнования всей команде, родственникам, жене это больно, это грустно и просто пиздец до слез обидно. RIP

10 Oct 2025, 21:32 UTC363 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ну вот и настал момент истины 😂 Блять, я не могу смотреть на это без смеха Прочитано

5 Oct 2025, 05:01 UTC402 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не поняла прикола, когда Мераб потушил Кори и тот упал на колени - бой не остановили Когда Перейра уронил Анкалаева и начал лупить в блок не пробивая - остановили бой Перейра гуд боец, но в данном случае странный мув был от рефери, в таком случае у Мераба была бы победа во втором раунде по такому же принципу

🔥5

4 Oct 2025, 15:26 UTC308 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Шо братцы, смотрим в 5 утра UFC?) Уже третий день не сплю до семи утра, чтоб продержаться и посмотреть бой 😂 А помогает не спать сериал «мир, дружба, жвачка» и как не странно WoT, будете смеяться - перееду танком ноги, у меня временная слабость на «пострелять», изучаю Американскую военную технику :D А че вы думали, с возрастом я еще и носки вязать начну и даже оливки есть

🔥6custom 53552943437017472583custom 53752935840376657843

22 Sept 2025, 09:25 UTC297 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хороший день, депрессию как рукой сняло 👻

🔥10

17 Sept 2025, 22:51 UTC348 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Здарова бандиты ;) Листала посты, наткнулась на пост за 5 мая где расписывала возможные сценарии по ставке Сегодня очевидно настало время для «среднего сценария» Снижение ставки без QE Денежку печатать не будут, опасно для инфляции, а вы банки держитесь там, ликвидность мы вам подрежем как ни крути Как по мне пока рано делать выводы, рынок примет решение в ближайшие дни, но не мгновенно, тряска была оч крутая, я п

🔥12custom 53552943437017472583

8 Sept 2025, 14:32 UTC324 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Все еще жду👻 ———————— Вчера бектестила квартальную теорию на золоте, хуета какая-то 😅, но это лишь на первый взгляд, просидела я за бектестом уверенные 3 часа, пытаясь понять что идет не так и как с этим бороться, но на третий час стало чуть легче, даже появились тейки :D причем несколько подряд, вероятно словила тренд просто, но этих 3х часов очень мало чтоб действительно понять работает ли теория и комфортно ли м

🔥4

5 Sept 2025, 21:18 UTC276 viewsread 8 August 2026

Чутка шатнуло, надеюсь это возможность добрать позу, а не дальше вниз 😅

5 Sept 2025, 21:01 UTC299 views2 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Приблизительно в 00:15-00:30 может шатнуть рынок Будет ребалансировка S&P 500 и возможно, что стратеджи и робингуд могут внести в данную индексную корзину, учитывая, что это компании которые напрямую завязаны с битком это может толкнуть его в одну из сторон Предполагаю, что если не внесут может быть движение вниз Если внесут, то вверх Вероятность того, что компания Сейлора будет внесена ~45% Думаю открытие позици

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptcircus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“circus in crypto🎪” (@cryptcircus), 259 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptcircus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.