Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CRYPTART

@cryptart

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

904subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001681563013
TypeChannel
Usernames@art_crypt @cryptart
DescriptionКрипто-аналитика без розовых очков, инсайды с обратной стороны рынка. Чат канала: @cryptart_chat Идейный вдохновитель: @artiomsmfw Информация в данном канале не является финансовой рекомендацией, а автор - плод воображения бесконтрольного ИИ.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cryptart

Growth

9047 Aug 2026, 04:26 — 904 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:31 — 904 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:267 Aug 2026, 04:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 903–905 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 04:31904no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:26904first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
614
Videos
22
Links
610

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡1939.6%
1225.0%
👍816.7%
💯48.33%
💩36.25%
👎12.08%
👻12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2025 to 21 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jan 2026, 08:24 UTC552 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Здорова, братва! Помните депали? Теперь нужно регаться в дроп За прошлый холд должны учесть, хоть поинты там уже другие совсем. Поэтому регаемся и кайфуем!

💩1

31 Dec 2025, 20:04 UTC546 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всех любимых подписчиков хочу поздравить с Новым Годом. Этот год был не простым, что уж говорить. Возможно и следующий будет не лучше. Важно уметь удары держать. Поэтому и пожелаю, помимо всего самого доброго, в плохие дни тоже не унывать 🔥

8

25 Dec 2025, 20:09 UTC511 viewsread 7 August 2026

Небольшой эксплойт трастваллета. Лучше пока хром расширение не открывать

25 Dec 2025, 20:08 UTC419 viewsread 7 August 2026

Community alert: A number of Trust Wallet users have reported that funds were drained from wallet addresses within the past couple of hours. While the exact root cause has not been determined coincidentally the Trust Wallet Chrome extension pushed a new update yesterday. Theft addresses 0x3b09A3c9aDD7D0262e6E9724D7e823Cd767a0c74 0x463452C356322D463B84891eBDa33DAED274cB40 0xa42297ff42a3b65091967945131cd1db962afae4 b

16 Dec 2025, 14:11 UTC421 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Привет! Скучали? Ну и ладно... Я с гемом, ну как гемом. В общем все вы знаете, что CZ фомоеб. Буквально. Он видит чужой успех и его прям трясет. Таким образом уже рождались нфт маркетплейсы, веб3 кошельки, а теперь и предикшн маркеты. Встречайте predict.fun. Новый (старый) зверь от CZ на bnb чейне. Естественно уже можно фармить поинты, естественно еще накинут за активность на конкурентских площадках. В общем кр

👍4🤡2

11 Dec 2025, 22:01 UTC340 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔥 До Квон приговорен к 15 годам тюремного заключения. Crypto Headlines

24 Nov 2025, 16:44 UTC499 viewsread 7 August 2026

В целом, как я и говорил, по такой цене можно и сейчас с рынка прикупить любой сайз ))

22 Nov 2025, 09:56 UTC485 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Нащупали ли дно? Лайк если откупил, клоуна если раскидал вакансии по ближайшим промышленным предприятиям

🤡61👍1👻1

22 Nov 2025, 09:56 UTC401 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @manna_money

Вот и вероятная причина падения подъехала 🚨 JPMorgan выпускает серьёзное предупреждение по MicroStrategy. Глобальный поставщик индексов MSCI рассматривает новое правило, которое исключит компании, у которых криптоактивы составляют более 50% от общего объёма активов, и это напрямую касается MicroStrategy. Если MSTR будет исключена из индексов MSCI, пассивные фонды будут *вынуждены продавать*, что приведёт к предпол

16 Nov 2025, 20:45 UTC≈2,470 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Он-чейн клоун года: Кошелек спавший 5 лет решил свапнуть 6.9 млн$ из Кардано $ADA в $USDA, местный стейбл (спойлер, у него не получилось) Но в связи с низкой ликвой получил лишь 850к$, в следствии чего выходной был испорчен. Бля, ребят, если не шарите, то спросите или загуглите...

🤡93👎1💩1

13 Nov 2025, 17:03 UTC517 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Меняться через P2P теперь невозможно ЦБ РФ предложил инициативу определение P2P-сделок: банки и площадки будут сверять личность плательщика: если деньги пришли не от того же человека, что указан в аккаунте на бирже, получателя заставят вернуть перевод отправителю. Что это значит на практике — ЦБ РФ усиливает внимание к P2P, потому что масштаб жалоб, мошенничества и серых схем стал очень критичным, регулятор фактич

👍3🤡2

12 Nov 2025, 19:15 UTC≈1,110 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пару слов про Монад. Когда я понял что что-то не так? Примерно в Июле, в чатике нашей команды по разработке пробежал слушок, что мол Монад чуть ли не бегают по проектам, упрашивая их переехать на Монад. Ну вроде нормально, бч должен париться за наличие разработчиков. Если бы не одно НО. За 3 месяца до этого ребята открывали форму, в которую набирали всех девов на Монаде, и обещали связаться с каждым, оказав им св

💯4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 529,291 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CRYPTART” (@cryptart), 904 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.