Насправді, просто доведеться трохи більше заморочитись з контентом)) ферму каналів в X все одно продовжу будувати. Покищо хороших результатів немає, так як недавно почав цим займатися, але як будуть обовʼязково поділюсь досвідом 🫡❤️

Channel
Super star agregator
@crypt0superstar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
219subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002079516646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypt0superstar |
| Description | Админ: @Grayysell |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypt0superstar |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 219 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 219 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.53%
- avg views ÷ 219 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3.4
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 20.0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 67 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,070
- Videos
- ≈683
- Links
- ≈2,280
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 10s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Ахахахах темка накрилась 💸 X припинить дію поточної програми монетизації для авторів і замінить її новою програмою "Програма винагород за оригінальний контент". Усі існуючі автори повинні будуть подати повторну заявку, починаючи з 8 вересня.
📊 | ІнвестМеми
В США жінки обігнали чоловіків за кількістю робочих місць. Ростуть медичка, догляд і сервіси, де традиційно більше жінок, чоловічі сфери стагнують. Молоді хлопці випадають із ринку праці. ~70% вільного часу вони геймять, а живуть за рахунок батьків або дівчат 📊 | ІнвестМеми
💸 Хочеш заробляти онлайн без вкладень? Тоді спробуй Grivna_Spark_bot ! 💸 У боті можна накопичувати кошти та виводити їх прямо на банківську картку. ⭐️ Доступні способи заробітку: 🔹 виконання простих завдань 🔹 щоденний бонус 🔹 реферальна програма 🔹 активація промокодів 🔹 регулярні конкурси з призами 🎁 Для нових користувачів є подарунок: ✅ E5X2FHRR 💰 0.70 грн 📊 35 активацій 👉 ТИСНИ І ЗАРОБЛЯЙ 😉 👈 📤 Мінімальна…
🐦 Signal хоче дозволити реєстрацію без номера телефону Signal – один із найпопулярніших месенджерів, що робить акцент на приватності та наскрізному шифруванні. Зараз для створення облікового запису в ньому потрібен номер телефону, але розробники працюють над тим, щоб усунути цю вимогу. Бутерін підтримав цю ідею. Це зменшує залежність від мобільних операторів, захищає від шахрайства з SIM-картами та ускладнює блоку…
⏸ Injective запустили амбассадорську програму. 🖥Учасники можуть виконувати завдання, створювати контент і залучати нових користувачів, щоб отримувати нагороди в $INJ. ℹ️Для Supporters кожні 2 тижні розподіляють 300 INJ серед топ-50, а для Creators — 2500 INJ щомісяця. 🛡Також запустили 2 сезон кампанії Injective × Zealy з додатковими завданнями та можливістю стати амбассадором. Корисні рефки: ✖️Bingx I 💎Weex I 📈Me…
🎉 Разом з адмінами хочу розділити між вами 17 500₴ на 15 щасливчиків⤵️ Потрібно лише зробити декілька підписок в цьому боті — ТИК 🖥 По призах: ❗️ 10.08 буде вибрано 15 переможців (10 перших отримають на каву, інші 5 — по 75$ зелених) Результати будуть в боті о 23:45 відповідного дня (там знайдете кнопку), усім бажаю удачі 🤞 📣Тех.питання та організація
💵РОЗІГРАШ💵 🎉В каналі мого знайомого зараз розіграш на 200 грн Беріть участь👇 https://t.me/soyercrypto/387
Місяць стейкінгу на BiniBit: Зробив черговий вивід 📈💰 🏆Сьогодні пройшов майже місяць, як я зайшов у стейкінг токена BINI на новій біржі BiniBit під шалені 160% APR. Щойно зробив черговий вивід на свій гаманець. Детально писав тут. 📊 Моя особиста статистика за 1 місяць: Мій депозит: $300 Загалом уже вивів: ~$30.5 Що потрібно робити? 👨💻 1️⃣ Реєструємось на BiniBit та проходимо KYC 2️⃣ Робимо депозит у будь-якій з…
Виграємо подорож на Балі + ділимо $100 000 від MEXC! 📈 🏆Біржа MEXC викотила масштабле літнє промо «Літній спринт» із призовим пулом у $100 000 та головним суперпризом — безкоштовною поїздкою на Балі! Що потрібно робити?👨💻 1️⃣ Зареєструватись на біржі MEXC 2️⃣ Зареєструватись у промо 3️⃣ Виконуємо завдання 📆 Дедлайн: 14 серпня 📈 РЕЄСТРАЦІЯ НА МЕХС ❤ КРИПТО САД | ЧАТ
🛍 Майкл Сейлор намагається залучити потужних гравців до своєї моделі: Банкам не потрібно конкурувати з STRC. Замість цього, вони можуть просто використовувати STRC. Банк залучає 1 трильйон доларів депозитів → пропонує клієнтам 8% завдяки STRC → залишає собі різницю в 2–3% → і заробляє "від 3 до 30 мільярдів на рік без жодного ризику". Вони можуть почати вже завтра))
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypt0superstar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 374,612 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Super star agregator” (@crypt0superstar), 219 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypt0superstar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.