Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 十字军圣殿屠支团Official

Channel

十字军圣殿屠支团Official

@crusaderbutchchink

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

685subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001330762062
TypeChannel
Username@crusaderbutchchink
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/crusaderbutchchink

Growth

685690687.57 August 2026 — 689 subscribers7 August 2026 — 690 subscribers14 August 2026 — 685 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 684–691 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:27685-5
7 Aug 2026, 19:48690+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:16689first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 685 subscribers
Avg views / post
94.5
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held18 (18 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total378
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1028.6%
👍822.9%
👏38.57%
🤡38.57%
🐳25.71%
🗿25.71%
😱25.71%
🙈25.71%
🌚12.86%
💯12.86%
🤯12.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC40 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

每当任何人想给支那人一点尊重,支那本性就会发作,坑尽世界爱支病

👍1😁1

27 Jul 2026, 02:58 UTC93 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @XueXi_ChinaPhoto

谁把我偶像爱国博主胡律师给开了? 😎 匿名投稿

😁3

20 Jul 2026, 00:33 UTC128 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Asagiriorg

#fun #opinion 支那全境自遠古起適合住人的就只有黃河沖積平原/黃河三角洲,即所謂的黃泛地區、支那核心。百越之所以打不過北來的諸夏,除開技術傳播因素,很大原因是雙方可耕作居住土地面積差異造成的人口差距,佔據黃河三角洲的支豬不斷向南、把包含巴蜀盆地的廣大贊米亞山間能耕之地全部墾殖,贊米亞也仍然很難與北支抗衡,於是想出了圍湖圍河造陸的神技,讓本來沒機會屠支的揚子江也化身老英雄年年上分。南侵的支豬對贊米亞的記述向來是瘴氣彌天不見日月人畜疫病橫行,就是古時氣候更加潮濕、雨線更北的證明。隨氣候極化雨線北移、今後支那豬暢飲咖啡會逐漸成為常態。可笑的是支豬竟然會堅信最近三十年靠日本援助起步搞的那點固沙和表層綠化能在咖啡機裡起作用,然而黃土高原黃土層最淺也有數十米遇水即化,咖啡再配提拉米蘇,給撈翔爽麻叻。 支那蝗蟲南侵的同時自然也不會放過黃河,黃土高原的原生植被被支豬破壞殆盡後沖刷下來的淤泥,如同所有河流入海口的三角洲一樣沖出扇形河

🐳2👏1

11 Jul 2026, 05:03 UTC155 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @XueXi_ChinaPhoto

水深火热(法新社笔误了,和浙江没关系,福建晋江)

11 Jul 2026, 05:03 UTC164 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @XueXi_China

共工和祝融刷击杀数呢,别大惊小怪的,说不定还有延长战。

👏2🤡1

9 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC116 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @XueXi_ChinaPhoto

还敢同情吗 😎 匿名投稿

8 Jul 2026, 02:27 UTC119 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @chinkslaughterhouseVideo

shina goblin daily

🗿2🤯1

8 Jul 2026, 02:23 UTC109 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Asagiriorg

#comment #history 支豬的謊言根本不堪一擊,刮共雙方都宣傳皇軍特別軍事行動是蓄謀已久,當然是支豬扯謊成性編出來的小說情節。日本蘇聯英國史料早已交叉證明皇軍在滿支邊境根本沒有相關行動計畫,也無大規模調兵,許多將領都不在崗,支那駐屯軍司令田代皖一郎中將更是病危,於7月16日去世,繼任的香月清司中將與支那29軍北洋名將宋哲元一度達成和議,被蔣該死強行阻攔,再由文宣說成是皇軍的緩兵之計,可謂逼臉不要;英國外交電文認為事件純屬偶然,根據北京議定書(辛丑和約)駐軍的皇軍演習時根本就沒上實彈,支豬文宣純屬胡扯。而在南面靠近蔣該死核心區的上海情勢就更加明顯,上海日租界駐軍不過四千加上三萬平民,刮軍則高達二十餘萬並提前兩年在納粹德國顧問指導下修築工事,傻子都能看出誰在求戰。支豬一次又一次突破人類底線,皇軍忍無可忍最終發起特別軍事行動暴支膺懲,正中幕後黑手蘇聯下懷。蔣該死背叛泛亞主義日本親爹,以為自己能同時在日蘇兩大帝國間佔便宜,

💯1

7 Jul 2026, 04:25 UTC120 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xijinping89646324

绝大多数中国人都是畏威不畏德的贱逼。 中国人的善恶观从来不是“我做这件事影不影响他人”,而是“我这么做,会不会被锤,如果被锤了,那我就是错了,如果没被锤,那我就没错”,所以共产党对支逼严刑峻法没有一点儿问题。 而且,出于各种原因,中国人又很自卑,受不了一点否定。正常人做了坏事,即使不被惩罚,也会在心里告诉自己“这样做不对,人家不跟我计较罢了,我下次要注意”,然而,支逼们想的是“越不对,我越要狡辩,坚决不能承认”。这就是人跟畜生的区别。

👍4

20 Jun 2026, 19:28 UTC193 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @znrgc

如果未来能出现fpv拷打支那猪整治交通屠支那肯定非常有趣,用三种武器,第一就是现在常见的爆炸自杀式,第二种白磷燃烧式,第三种挂载穿刺物,当支那猪的老头乐电动车自行车挤成一团动弹不的时用白磷燃烧天降正义使支那猪更加混乱欣赏它们如野猪般乱窜的幽默场面,毕竟拥堵的交通需要燃起来才好 当汽车各种堵路违停乱拐时使用自杀式fpv炸支那猪驾驶员,使用聚能装药直接一条直线击穿多辆汽车给支那猪一点爱的教育 当出现那种最最最能发支瘟把马路当它家客厅梦游的极品支那猪时使用穿刺物fpv穿刺支那猪的臭逼烂屌和屁眼,让剧痛给做发瘟梦的支那猪大脑升级清醒清醒

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @crusaderbutchchink. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,118,904 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“十字军圣殿屠支团Official” (@crusaderbutchchink), 685 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crusaderbutchchink.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.