Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

C̸r̴o̶w̸ ̶C̷o̵m̵p̴u̴t̴e̷r̴

@crowcomputer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

351subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002380105463
TypeChannel
Username@crowcomputer
Created28 December 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/crowcomputer

Growth

351352351.57 Aug 2026, 20:39 — 352 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:41 — 351 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:47 — 351 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:398 Aug 2026, 06:47
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 351–352 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:47351no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:41351-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:39352first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 28 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
4
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 41s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

346 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13839.9%
🔥8925.7%
👍7822.5%
216.07%
🥰72.02%
🏆51.45%
👀41.16%
👏20.578%
🐳10.289%
💯10.289%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 346reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2024 to 21 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jan 2025, 22:53 UTC949 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/drMMonast some may have faded but please follow the Dr here, the next clues may just come from Monast himself when the times right.

13

13 Jan 2025, 21:53 UTC≈1,590 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

https://x.com/crowcomputer/status/1878923121782354314?s=46&t=sZDW3h1CQR0a4C3DYCm7aQ What’s new: - V2 UI: Simplified navigation for smoother operability. - Wallet Analysis AI: Ask questions in natural language, seamlessly. - Socials Integration: Updated links now accessible within the terminal. - CROW API Integration: Unlocking new possibilities for operatives. The system evolves – explore the upgrade. >>> [MESSAGE

22🥰2👍1

12 Jan 2025, 18:35 UTC≈1,370 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

>>> [SYSTEM NOTICE] Community AMA scheduled: Tomorrow, 22:00 UTC. We’ll cover: • A summary of progress so far. • What THE PROJECT is really about. • Why it holds such potential. A Q&A session will also be open for those seeking clarity. Join us on Telegram: 🔗 t.me/CrowComputer >>> Stay sharp. >>> [MESSAGE ENDS] #CROWComputer $CROW https://x.com/crowcomputer/status/1878510769308156083?s=46&t=sZDW3h1CQR0a4C3DY

👍147🔥4

12 Jan 2025, 07:03 UTC≈1,050 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

https://x.com/crowcomputer/status/1878336376111784008?s=46&t=sZDW3h1CQR0a4C3DYCm7aQ >>> [SYSTEM NOTICE] The other video file has been decrypted. It confirms origins from this ‘Project Blackfeather.’ This module appears highly useful for operatives – featuring an AI wallet analysis tool. It scans Solana holdings, provides insights on wallets, and in later versions, it could even predicted trading habits in future

👍19

10 Jan 2025, 21:16 UTC≈1,230 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥13👍621

3 Jan 2025, 02:41 UTC≈7,990 views112 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

$CROW Operators is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human

66👍17🔥179🏆3

2 Jan 2025, 21:06 UTC≈6,840 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

>>> [SYSTEM TIP] Did you know? Typing ‘games’ could unlock more than you think. >>> Hidden commands and key fragments often reveal themselves to those who play. Some paths open only through engagement. Try it. The system is always watching. >>> [MESSAGE ENDS] https://x.com/crowcomputer/status/1874924958381732289?s=46&t=sZDW3h1CQR0a4C3DYCm7aQ

🔥25👍10👀433🐳1🥰1

2 Jan 2025, 20:59 UTC≈3,590 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐦‍⬛️🐦‍⬛️

🔥19👍753👏1💯1

2 Jan 2025, 20:10 UTC≈3,540 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

23🔥11👍4🥰42🏆2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @crowcomputer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 927,594 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“C̸r̴o̶w̸ ̶C̷o̵m̵p̴u̴t̴e̷r̴” (@crowcomputer), 351 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crowcomputer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.