If you’re not ghey, you’ll like these calls https://t.me/gucciscalls

Channel
Crommander’s Crypto Reviews
@crommandersreviews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001619490138 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crommandersreviews |
| Description | Constantly looking for the next low cap gem. Invest at your own risk. Discussion: @crommanderslounge Inquiries: @crommander |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 7 October 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crommandersreviews |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 28 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 28 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 30
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 97
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 13 | 76.5% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2022 to 10 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
i heard alpha dyor though https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xa74a466f6afdcc70e0db0f0515574494f43f7163
Hit up da homie for all your digital art needs https://t.me/abrakai
💯1🔥1
ANOTHER HIGH RISK MOONARCH FIND Probly scam but I aped $1.2k https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x259d54f4796d5f0ad61a5d9ab4c9356971d27d54
Meanwhile Serum is approaching another ATH at 1.6M right now. Bullish on this one https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xd8e29dc9385b721ddca4f8611d4a6109575b788a
Made a nice 3x on it but not worth the risk and now its under $10k
meh maybe stay away. its turning to a shit show. hit 25k ath people arguing now.
Degen Gamble Ser is sending and i found a baby ser on moonarch. So far this is sending. Know nothing about the dev DYOR! https://t.me/BabySer https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x90734a326ca0bedf057cd7fda3bba66230a0bcab
Its starting...
Proof of Satoshi Buy! 👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽 💵 0.128 ETH ($164.05) 🪙 19,000 POS 👤 0xc3c8…92a9 | Txn | Track ✅ New Holder 🔘 Market Cap $8,575 📊 Chart ⚙️ Tracker 🔵 Trending
👍1
Last time I posted, you would have been about 3x at the height of the reversal when it went from $8k to about $24k. Right now its back down to $7.5k and there are big things coming. Roadmap being released in hours, website being worked on, twitter competition live ($15 USDT to 3 people). Don't fade. NFA DYOR https://twitter.com/ProofSatoshiETH/status/1579572369286639616 TG: @satoshiproofentry
❤1🔥1
back over $20k
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crommandersreviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@crommandersreviews named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crommander’s Crypto Reviews” (@crommandersreviews), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crommandersreviews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.