Channel
@crnchz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004371172218 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crnchz |
| Description | main cr: iznavibe, jungeunfile, jungeunglobal, rsrpics, sarangglobal |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 4 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crnchz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 28 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 28 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (4 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 371 |
| Reactions total | 107 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
107 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 66 | 61.7% | |
| 👀 | 41 | 38.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Q. каким бы был совместный спэшл стэйдж саран и чонын? 🐆: о, у меня есть один такой! я бы очень хотела вокальный номер. вокальный номер, где мы бы наслаждались сценой, держали ручные микрофоны… и все выглядит так, будто мы просто отрываемся на сцене 🐶: я тоже хочу вокальный номер! но знаешь, типа в таком стиле: надеть платья, прям очень долгие платья. где поешь, бегая по всей сцене! это было бы оч круто 🐆: как романт…
❤3👀1
хэппи ная дэй 🎉🎂 не верится, что мы уже два года вместе. время так быстро летит. спасибо за то, что всегда рядом, поддерживаете и любите нас. каждый раз, когда я вспоминаю все, что мы пережили вместе, кажется, будто я снова возвращаюсь в те дни. и эти воспоминания такие яркие, что до сих пор заставляют мое сердце трепетать. сила и энергия, подаренная ная - моя самая большая мотивация. мы, изна, будем стараться еще бо…
❤6👀3
ная дэй 💖 мы уже два года вместе. не верится, что это уже ваша вторая годовщина… вы первые, кто так тепло празднует со мной такие особенные дни. спасибо за то, что всегда остаетесь на нашей стороне, несмотря ни на что. когда мне было особенно тяжело, я повторяла себе: «у тебя есть ная, думай о них», и именно это помогало мне двигаться дальше. я очень надеюсь, что вы знаете, насколько огромной поддержкой являетесь для…
👀5❤3
LIKE ZIP IDC
❤4👀3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5👀3
Q. вы делали что-то милое сегодня? 🐶: коко онни моя руммейтка. вчера ночью ее одеяло сползло, и казалось, что ей холодно, поэтому перед тем, как уснуть, я укрыла ее одеялом и только потом пошла спать 🐆: разве это не очень мило? 🐶: я всегда ложусь спать позже коко онни, так что вчера я сделала такой свит герли мув и пошла спать 🐆: это так мило, я завидую… 🐶: завидуешь?!?!?!?
❤5👀2
насколько же красиво
👀5❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5👀4
дуры 😭😭
❤7👀3
милые привычки корнчизиков :3 🐶 → пока спит, ложится на плечо другой мемберки 🐆 → громко и уверенно ходит, что мемберки узнают ее по шагам
❤6👀3
что девочки подарили чонын: саран - одежду (они вчера ходили по магазинам, и ччон все время сомневалась, нужна ли ей эта или другая вещь, но саран сказала, что она купит все, что чонын пожелает, как подарок) коко - удобные тапочки (чонын одела их сегодня на работу) маи - подарочную карту а подарки джимин и сэби еще не пришли
❤6👀2
ччоник заплакала, пока на лайве читала письмо от ная :( naya: я разговаривала с подругой в кафе, когда вдруг заиграла рэйскар. я удивилась, типа: «вау, песня изна», а девушка за соседним столиком сказала тому, кто с ней сидел: «вау, мне нравится эта партия! она правда круто поет!» и мне стало так приятно, будто это меня похвалили. от мысли, что кто-то узнает и любит голос чонын, я ощутила гораздо больше счастья, чем …
❤6👀3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @crnchz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 503,847 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“the greatest” (@crnchz), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crnchz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.