Channel
@criptosegnali
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
913subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001423789645 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @criptosegnali |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/criptosegnali |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 913 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 916 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 917 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 908 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
41 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 51.2% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 31.7% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
31 su 100. È il Fear & Greed Index di oggi, eppure gli ETF spot hanno incassato 101.7M di inflow nelle ultime 24h. Il retail ha paura, gli istituzionali comprano. 🗜️ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📉 SITUAZIONE ATTUALE (TF Daily) BTC si muove nel range 62.400-65.250, in un canale discendente di breve termine con lower highs e lower lows. I volumi spot sono ai minimi da novembre 2023 e la volatilità è compressa al 3.87/100: seg…
👍1
BTC continua a lateralizzare intorno a 65000 senza dare segni evidenti di "direzione". Godetevi questo sabato, se succede qualcosa lo scrivo qui.
👍1🔥1
Aggiornamento TRX 👀
🔥2
80,4% delle liquidazioni nelle ultime 24h sono state short. Eppure il prezzo non è esploso al rialzo. Ecco perché. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📉 SITUAZIONE ATTUALE (TF Daily) BTC si muove nel range 62.000 – 66.600. La struttura attuale mostra una consolidazione estiva "noiosa" ma tecnicamente significativa: volumi in crescita del 13,5% rispetto alla media, con un'azione dei prezzi compressa sotto la resistenza psicologic…
👍1🔥1
Agosto separa due tipi di trader: chi stacca la spina e chi il grafico se lo porta comunque in spiaggia.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Manteniamo la calma, BTC è in una zona di reazione importante. Non tradate per noia.
👍1🤝1
📊 LINK/USDT — MURO DI LIQUIDITÀ A 929,72K SOPRA IL PREZZO, E STA INCASTRATO IN MEZZO A DUE PARETI ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📐 STRUTTURA DI MERCATO • Daily: bias ribassista, lower high in formazione (10,80 → 8,80), prezzo sotto il CHoCH daily rosso • Il correttivo di luglio si è esaurito in compressione, senza rompere la struttura ribassista di fondo • 4H: CHoCH + BOS ribassisti confermati dopo il top del 27/07 — …
👍2🔥1
Aggiornamento TRX 👀
👍2
9 su 100. È il Social Score di Bitcoin oggi, dentro la zona di Extreme Fear — mentre il Whale Score segna 74 e il dato Order Book 76, entrambi in area Greed. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📊 ANALISI TECNICA BITCOIN – 7 Agosto 2026 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Il mercato non premia la fretta: i numeri parlano, le narrative no. Oggi BTC naviga in acque istituzionali, dove il retail misura la paura e gli smart money misurano la liquidità. …
🔥2
+26% in una settimana, ma la candela daily più recente è rossa. La liquidità dice perché. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📊 HYBRID LOGIC PROTOCOL Analisi — XAG/USDT (Silver) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔎 STRUTTURA DI MERCATO Silver ha messo a segno un rally deciso da area 58 fino a ridosso di 63, con una struttura 4H che ha marcato un CHoCH rialzista netto. Il problema è che l'ultima candela daily chiude a -2,07%, esattamente d…
❤1👍1🔥1
Babbo Natale non esiste. Eppure nella tua testa quella convinzione c'è ancora. Solo che non ha più corrente. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 LA DISATTIVAZIONE DELLE CREDENZE Sai razionalmente che dovresti tagliare una perdita. Poi il prezzo si muove e fai l'esatto contrario. Non è mancanza di disciplina. È una convinzione ancora attiva. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 Le convinzioni non si cancellano Sono energia strutturata. Non s…
👍1👏1
Aggiornamento TRX 👀
👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @criptosegnali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Agosto separa due tipi di trader: chi stacca la spina e chi il grafico se lo porta comunque in spiaggia.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,159,526 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cripto segnali Eu 🎯” (@criptosegnali), 913 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/criptosegnali.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.