Channel
@criptazar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
297subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001690284136 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @criptazar |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 22 June 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/criptazar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 297 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 298 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 298 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
120 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 68 | 56.7% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 8.33% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 8.33% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 7.50% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 7.50% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 4.17% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.33% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 2.50% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.833% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.833% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2022 to 24 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Nota di servizio: sul Bitcoin lavorano a meraviglia praticamente TUTTI i sistemi trendfollowing che avevo prodotto nei primi anni della mia attivita' di trader sistemista, tra il 2014 e il 2016 😅 Ci mettiamo uno sfondo di base della BullRunFormula che scoprirete il 3 Aprile... e ci si fa un sacco di soldi!!!! 🏆🥇👑💰💵💶💳 https://bullrunformula.com/optin-org
❤2
😂 un po' incasinata ma ci sta!
😁6🤔1
🤣 addio i 5000 euro che avevo lì
😢5❤1😱1
(ANSA) - MILANO, 04 APR - La Procura di Milano in udienza oggi davanti al Tribunale fallimentare ha ribadito la richiesta, già depositata, di liquidazione giudiziale, ossia la nuova procedura che ha sostituito il fallimento, per The Rock Trading srl, società-piattaforma per investimenti in criptovalute, in particolare bitcoin e leader in questo settore, finita anche al centro di un’inchiesta milanese per ipotesi di t…
❤2
Magari pochi di voi usano WhiteBIT come criptoexchange, ma se per caso avete qualcosa dentro... prelevate tutto subito e scappate. 😉 👍👑 (info insider)
👌9❤3👍2
localbitcoins.com chiude! è una strage...
😱3👍2❤1
Quando ti comunicano che un exchange ha chiuso per problemi di liquidità e tu ci avevi 5.000 Euro dentro per delle operazioni di arbitraggio… 🙈😑😂👑💵💰💴💳💶
👍3❤1🔥1
Interessante.
👍8🔥1
Dal 5 dicembre, il wallet di Coinbase non supporterà piú Bitcoin Cash, Ripple, Ethereum Classic e Stellar perché non le usa nessuno. Se qualcuno ve le consiglia come componenti di un portafoglio di altcoin - ridetegli in faccia.
👍9
Ma lo avete capito perché ancora non ho detto a nessuno dei miei follower di comprare cripto (almeno non ancora)? 😏😎
👍14
Non male, non male… 😁
🤣3
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @criptazar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LA CRIPTA DELLO ZAR” (@criptazar), 297 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/criptazar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.