Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Крым INFO

Channel

Крым INFO

@crimeainfo82

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,038subscribers

-213 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001657728583
TypeChannel
Username@crimeainfo82
DescriptionАктуальные и оперативные новости Крыма и Севастополя: происшествия, события, сплетни и факты. Написать нам: @CrimeaInfo82_bot Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/crimeainfo82 РКН: https://vk.cc/cFpxIp
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/crimeainfo82

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@sevinfo92/402698 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC@crimeainfo82/27665 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC1.00under a minute
@sevinfo92/4114918 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC@crimeainfo82/28460 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@sevinfo92/4124119 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC@crimeainfo82/28544 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC1.0072 seconds
@crimeainfo82/28635 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC@sevinfo92/4135120 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC1.003.3 hours
@sevinfo92/4157324 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC@crimeainfo82/28847 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC1.00under a minute
@sevinfo92/4170726 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC@crimeainfo82/28965 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@sevinfo92195 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minutethis entry (109–86)
@retrosevastopol6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (4–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 72 of the 72 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 520 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @sevinfo92. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

14,03814,25114,144.57 August 2026 — 14,251 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,251 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,250 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,243 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,240 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,237 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,228 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,225 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,221 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,216 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,211 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,207 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,200 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,198 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,191 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,185 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,174 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,170 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,168 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,166 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,158 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,149 subscribers7 September 2026 — 14,137 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,129 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,119 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,112 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,105 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,116 subscribers2 October 2026 — 14,124 subscribers7 October 2026 — 14,126 subscribers11 October 2026 — 14,120 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,119 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,120 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,116 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,103 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,097 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,095 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,089 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,084 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,087 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,083 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,076 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,072 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,071 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,068 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,064 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,057 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,056 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,055 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,056 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,055 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,052 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,048 subscribers8 November 2026 — 14,045 subscribers12 November 2026 — 14,038 subscribers7 August 202612 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 97 days, net -213. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,006–14,283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 07:4614,038-7
8 Nov 2026, 14:4814,045-3
7 Nov 2026, 11:5714,048-4
6 Nov 2026, 10:5614,052-3
5 Nov 2026, 08:0714,055-1
4 Nov 2026, 09:3614,056+1
3 Nov 2026, 11:0814,055-1
2 Nov 2026, 10:3614,056-1
1 Nov 2026, 13:1814,057-7
31 Oct 2026, 14:4714,064-4
30 Oct 2026, 14:1614,068-3
29 Oct 2026, 13:0714,071-1
28 Oct 2026, 11:4814,072-4
27 Oct 2026, 14:1614,076-7
25 Oct 2026, 17:1014,083-4
24 Oct 2026, 19:1814,087+3
22 Oct 2026, 16:2914,084-5
21 Oct 2026, 11:1114,089-6
20 Oct 2026, 10:4614,095-2
19 Oct 2026, 07:3614,097first reading

Engagement

960 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.88%
avg views ÷ 14,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
264
205 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.704%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
206
of 960 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 129 of 205 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held960 (7 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total54,082
Reactions total256
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 19:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈14,900
Videos
≈5,560
Links
≈21,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 15m
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 101 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,152 reactions across 466 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏31927.7%
👍31527.3%
❤22919.9%
😱645.56%
😢635.47%
👎413.56%
🤬363.13%
😁201.74%
🤣201.74%
🔥131.13%
🤔121.04%
😍70.608%
🎉40.347%
🫡40.347%
🤯30.26%
👏10.087%
🥰10.087%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 478 of the 960 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 960 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.313%
3 of 960 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
224
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
248
over 956 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Vtzquyrwan14 November 20264 November 2026
2VtzqwCcYxn111 November 202611 November 2026
2VtzqxXW5CF18 August 20268 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 960 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 206 posts held from the last 30 days (0.971%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 19:15 UTC66 viewsread 12 November 2026

❗️ В Крыму женщину приговорили к 17 годам колонии за подготовку подрыва автомобиля военнослужащего По данным суда, в 2024 году женщину завербовали сотрудники СБУ, а в апреле 2025 года ей поручили найти автомобиль командира авиаполка Черноморского флота для совершения теракта. Для выполнения задания она приехала в Крым, где приобрела взрывчатку, компоненты для самодельного взрывного устройства и оборудование для дис…

12 Nov 2026, 18:55 UTC116 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

⚡️Внимание всем! Воздушная тревога! Следим за ситуацией 👉 https://max.ru/sevinfo92

🔥1

12 Nov 2026, 16:35 UTC255 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

😱 В Крыму 15-летний подросток поджёг автомобиль ради обещанных 100 тысяч рублей На парковке торгового центра в Симферополе школьник проник в незапертый ВАЗ и поджёг водительское сиденье с помощью зажигалки. Ущерб владельцу составил около 200 тысяч рублей. По словам подростка, он нашёл в интернете предложение о «подработке». Неизвестный куратор пообещал ему 100 тысяч рублей за поджог любого автомобиля. Выполнение за…

12 Nov 2026, 16:16 UTC248 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

✅✅✅ Отбой воздушной тревоги Следим за ситуацией 👉 https://max.ru/sevinfo92

😢1🙏1

12 Nov 2026, 15:56 UTC262 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026

⚡️Мониторинговые каналы сообщают о ракетной опасности по ПКР Нептун для Крыма и Севастополя 💡 Карта наличия света в Севастополе Следим за ситуацией 👉 https://max.ru/sevinfo92

🔥1🙏1

12 Nov 2026, 15:51 UTC268 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

⚡️Внимание всем! Воздушная тревога! Следим за ситуацией 👉 https://max.ru/sevinfo92

🔥1

12 Nov 2026, 14:42 UTC272 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026

⚡️ Крымчанина приговорили к 17 годам колонии за шпионаж в пользу Украины Мужчина собирал и передавал украинским спецслужбам сведения о военных объектах в Севастополе, включая позиции ПВО, радиолокационную станцию Черноморского флота и боновые заграждения. Кроме того, он публиковал в мессенджере призывы к совершению теракта и насильственным действиям в отношении президента России. Южный окружной военный суд назначи…

👍2👎1

12 Nov 2026, 13:12 UTC288 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026

⚖️ Крымчанин получил 7 лет колонии за убийство сожительницы Напомним, в мае этого года 53-летний безработный житель Армянска в ходе ссоры на улице ударил сожительницу ножом в шею. Женщина погибла на месте от полученных травм. Суд приговорил мужчину к 7 годам лишения свободы в колонии строгого режима. Прокуратура города сочла наказание чрезмерно мягким и подала апелляционное представление, сообщили в прокуратуре Кры…

👍1

12 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTC305 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026

‼️ Ситуация с энергоснабжением Крыма стабилизируется в ближайшее время, заявил глава крымского парламента Владимир Константинов. «Загадывать крайне сложно, тем не менее, федеральными и крымскими властями работа ведется в круглосуточном режиме… Все находится в завершающей фазе, поэтому будем надеяться на благоприятный исход в ближайшее время», – сказал Константинов. Он отметил, что в нынешней ситуации энергетическог…

🙏2❤1

12 Nov 2026, 10:54 UTC279 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

❗️ Крымчанин планировал совершить теракт по заданию украинского куратора Как сообщили в прокуратуре республики, мужчина, будучи противником проведения специальной военной операции, связался с представителем ГУР Украины. Для совершения теракта он извлек из тайника охотничий порох и самодельное зажигательное устройство. Совершить задуманное ему не удалось — злоумышленника задержали сотрудники УФСБ России по Крыму и С…

12 Nov 2026, 09:41 UTC262 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

⚡ Алиса в сети? На карте СевСвета ваш дом загорится зелёным Когда «Севастопольэнерго» сообщает об ограничениях без списка адресов, сложно понять, есть ли свет именно у вас. Теперь в СевСвете можно подключить Яндекс Станцию или другое устройство из «Дома с Алисой». Свежий сигнал «В сети» даёт дому зелёную метку. На обновлённой карте три слоя: 💡 Свет — общая карта домов, действующие ограничения и плановые отключения…

👍1👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 960 posts we hold for @crimeainfo82. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Nov 2026, 18:15 UTCAnonymous Poll104 voters

💡 Как у вас дела со светом?

  1. Свет есть 💡55%
  2. Света нет 🕯45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 960 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Севастополь INFO
@sevinfo92 · 62,691
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Оперативный Севастополь
@oper_sevastopol · 20,002
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 September 2026
Привет, это Крым
@crimia_max · 29,492
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
Радар Крым
@bad_news_crimea · 49,477
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 25 August 2026
Симферополь в курсе
@simferopol_vkurse · 31,999
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 5 September 2026
НОВОСТИ СИМФЕРОПОЛЬ
@crimea_24 · 19,840
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 September 2026
Большая Морская | Севастополь
@bm92sev · 26,331
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 September 2026
Севкор z Новости Севастополя z
@SKorrespondent · 28,819
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
НОВОСТИ КРЫМ
@crimea24new · 91,875
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Крым INFO” (@crimeainfo82), 14,038 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crimeainfo82.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.