Канал об особенностях мышления, методиках генерации идей и развития насмотренности 💡
Подкаст «Адвокаты Мёрфи»:
https://taplink.cc/murphylaw
Авторский канал Евгения Клеща
Created
Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 904–906 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 01:03
905
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:32
905
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
34.7%
avg views ÷ 905 subscribers
Avg views / post
314
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
10 (10 April 2026 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
1,569
Reactions total
66
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
423
Videos
52
Links
122
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
157 reactions across 9 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
33
21.0%
❤
30
19.1%
❤🔥
14
8.92%
👏
13
8.28%
👍
11
7.01%
😁
10
6.37%
🤔
9
5.73%
😍
8
5.10%
🥰
7
4.46%
🤯
6
3.82%
💯
4
2.55%
⚡
3
1.91%
🕊
2
1.27%
😢
2
1.27%
🤣
2
1.27%
🍓
1
0.637%
🤩
1
0.637%
🦄
1
0.637%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 10 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @creativeklesh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 April 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Кристофер Нолан шарит за ТРИЗ 💡
Режиссер Одиссеи шибко любит пленочную съемку и IMAX камеры, но есть нюанс... технология такой съемки очень шумная. Настолько, что глушит голоса актеров на площадке.
Поэтому по чистому ТРИЗу они нашли первое решение: смастерили для камеры звукопоглощающий бокс. Однако возник следующий нюанс: камера стала настолько огромной, что перекрывала актеров при съемке диалогов крупным планом.
…
Как это часто бывает, люди с Реддита (канал Filmmakers) проделали невероятную вещь: проанализировали фильмы десятков режиссеров на среднюю длину монтажной склейки! Во-первых, давайте скажем спасибо за титанический труд! Во-вторых, я решил сделать еще один шаг и добавил к этим расчетам число снятых картин, средние цифры по кассовым сборам, а также рейтинги от зрителей и критиков, чтобы мы смогли посмотреть, существует…
#кейс
Американцы с корейцами разработали прототип самонадевающейся одежды 👖
Идея возникла у разработчика во время поездки на велосипеде, подумалось ему, а почему дождевик не может надеться сам… и понеслась
За ключевой образ взяли Лианы плюща, которые обвиваются вокруг препятствий. Реализовали с помощью тонких трубок, по которым закачивают воздух, чтобы поднять слой одежды.
Пока речи о коммерческом применении нет,…
Когда вам захочется потратить лишние 230 баксов, вспомните этот пост
Чудо инженерной мысли! ИИ-мания выходит на физический уровень. OpenAI представила ПУЛЬТ для управления ИИшкой...
Он отображает статус параллельных чатов, позволяет сказать ДА или НЕТ (как в шоу голос) задаче, подкрутить мощность нейронки и еще пару функций, про которые вы вряд ли задумывались до этого самого момента.
Вопрос простой: будут ли милл…
Вы вот думаете, почему постов в канале два месяца не было? Потому что я готовил что-то большое? Отнюдь… к сожалению, сил на полноценные посты пока не хватает
Зато есть немного разговорного контента с рабочих полей 😎
Поговорили с Дмитрием Бикбаевым про Анну Каренину, роль и задачи великого произведения и немного про её экранизации и театрализации 🤌🏻
Никогда не устану рекомендовать ORNAMENT как лучший контент про кино, а здесь ещё и такой повод!
Номера про Кубрика, Нолана, Лична или Тарантино, безусловно, чудесны, но вот номер про советское кино – настоящее чудо!
Аэлита, Сталкер, Три тополя на Плющихе, наш Холмс, Свой среди чужих, чужой среди своих и многие другие бессмертные шедевры кинематографа, который творил, продвигал большие идеи, показывал будущее и изо…
Любопытный #кейс нынче можно увидеть в Третьяковской галерее (которая новая новая на набережной)
Представьте ситуацию: из-за санкций у вас нет возможности привозить западных современников, а к азиатскому искусству наш люд не шибко привыкший. Остаются только свои запасы, которые уже вроде как все в столице повидали. Что делать? Правильно, изобретать концепции.
Выставка «Архетипы авангарда» - это пока самая классная …
Адвокаты Мёрфи на связи 🧑⚖️
Замечали ли вы, что страх что-то потерять часто сильнее, чем потенциальная радость что-то получить?
Страх даже незначительного проигрыша способен удержать нас от участия в ситуации, предполагающей вероятностный исход, даже если потенциальный выигрыш многократно превышает возможные потери.
На эффекте неприятия потерь строится экономика, инвестиции, маркетинг и еще много сфер нашей жизни…
Прямо сейчас у вас в камере телефона, наверняка, есть кнопочка 0,5, которая включает сверхширокоугольный объектив. Появилась она там благодаря одному удивительному человеку.
Михаил Русинов – инженер-оптик первым в мире создал конструкцию объектива с углом обзора 100 градусов и открыл феномен аберрационного виньетирования. Любопытно, что до его прорыва немцы из Zeiss и американцы считали создание таких объективов нев…
❤🔥12⚡3❤1👏1🔥1😍1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @creativeklesh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 644,611 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Креативный Клещ” (@creativeklesh), 905 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/creativeklesh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
