Channel
@crazyfounders
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
286subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001796078265 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crazyfounders |
| Description | از استارتاپها میگم و مینویسم. استارتاپهای ایرانی و خارجی رو بررسی میکنم. ایدههایی که ممکنه به دردتون بخوره رو معرفی میکنم و سعی میکنم کمک کنم که با سرمایهگذارهای اروپایی آشنا بشید. راستی من سامان فائق هستم Youtube.com/@coffeeandstartup |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 11 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crazyfounders |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 286 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 286 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
139 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 138 | 99.3% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.719% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2023 to 12 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اینطور که داره توئیت میشه، مثل اینکه بیدود، سرویس کرایه دوچرخه در تهران، برای همیشه تعطیل شد. با وجود اینکه تعطیلی هیچ سرویسی خوشحالم نمیکنه و اتفاقاً ناراحتم میکنه، میخوام بدونید که گاهی ما قربانی استراتژی غلط میشیم. هنوز معتقدم در شهر پر شیبی مثل تهران، دوچرخههای سنگین بیدود، احتمالاً فقط در مسیرهای خاص شرقی-غربی کارایی داشت. اونی که اهل دوچرخه بود، که دوچرخه داره و این دوچرخه برای افرادی که دوچرخه سوار حرفه…
👍15
بانک سیلیکونولی SVB ورشکست شده و اکثر مشتریها هم استارتاپها بودن. احتمالا یه اختلال کوتاهمدتی در جریان نقدینگی یه سری استارتاپها رخ بده مثل اینکه هزینههای اضافی رو برای مدتی باید کاهش بدن. این زمان بهترین فرصت برای رقباست که توی تبلیغات جلو بیوفتن @coffeeandstqrtup
👍2
آدم فکر میکنه این مرحله که از ایده شروع میشه و تا طراحی محصول طول میکشه، اصل داستانه. هرچی جلوتر میری و به لانچ نزدیک میشی، با چالشهای جدیدی روبرو میشی که از اول فکرش رو کردی ولی با ابعاد جدیدش طوری آشنا میشی که احساس میکنی دفعه اوله با این موضوع روبرو شدی. قشنگیش اونجاست که محصول طراحی میکنی، وارد بازار میشی تمام تصوراتت به هم میریزه. یعنی اون بخشی که تصور میکردی نقطه قوتت هست تقریباً نادیده گرفته میشه و اون بخشی …
👍13
اینجا لایو بریم میبینید؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
رفقا سلام در کنار درگیریهایی که برای راهاندازی استارتاپم دارم، چند وقته روی طراحی یک دوره آموزش آنلاین دارم تلاش میکنم و حسابی گرفتار بودم. ولی یه خبر دارم که به نظر خودم خبر خوبیه. قراره چند روز دیگه با یکی از فاندرهای یک استارتاپ موفق اروپایی یه گپ و گفتی داشته باشیم تا کل مسیری که طی کرده رو بررسی کنیم. اگر هنور کانال یوتیوب رو سابسکرایب نکردی، از لینک زیر سابسکرایب کن، اطلاعرسانی انتشار اینجا، ممکنه یکی دو…
👍13
آخرین قسمت (قسمت چهارم) از سری ویدئوهای استراتژیهای بازاریابی کمهزینه در یوتیوب منتشر شد. لطفاً اینجا کلیک کنید و ویدئو را تماشا کنید (با فیلتر شکن روشن) @SamanFaeghAcademy
👍5
فرقی نمیکنه که بخواهید مهاجرت کنید یا نه در هر دو حال، اگر تصمیم گرفتید که یک استارتاپ راهاندازی کنید، حتماً به فایل Pitch Deck نیاز خواهید داشت. توی این ویدئو به این سوالات پاسخ دادم: - هدف از تهیه این فایل چیست؟ - چه بخشهایی دارد؟ - چطور باید تهیه شود؟ - اگر به مهاجرت از طریق استارتاپ ویزا فکر میکنید، این فایل چطور و کجا به درد شما خواهد خورد اینجا کلیک کنید و در یوتیوب ببینید @CoffeeAndStartup | قهوه و است…
👍6
رضا قربانی در یک توئیت، این مقاله از HBR را معرفی کرده بود. واقعاً حیفم آمد نخوانید. عنوان: استارتاپها، وقت آن است که شبیه به یک شتر فکر کنید، نه مثل یک تکشاخ (یونیکورن) https://hbr.org/2020/10/startups-its-time-to-think-like-camels-not-unicorns @SamanFaeghAcademy
دوستان سلام یه راهنما پیدا کردم که خیلی جالب بود. اگر تمایل دارید که یک محصول دیجیتال راهاندازی کنید، این مطلب احتمالاً ممکنه به دردتون بخوره. راهنمایی میکنه که چطور نسخه بتای محصول خودتون رو طراحی و لانچ کنید https://tdwebservices.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-launching-a-successful-digital-product/ @CoffeeAndStartup
👍5
من پیشنهادات ایموجی که تلگرام روی کلمات میده رو دوست دارم. حقیقتاً تلگرام رو واقعاً دوست دارم. @CoffeeAndStartup
👍20
دوستان سلام ویدئوی بازاریابی کم هزینه قسمت سوم رو آپلود کردم. از روی لینک زیر میتونید ببینید: با فیلتر شکن باز کنید https://youtu.be/tgPucc4Q5xk اگر کانال رو سابسکرایب نکردید، ممنون میشم سابسکرایب کنید. اگر هم فکر میکنید به درد یکی از دوستان میخوره، ممنون میشم براش فروارد کنید. نکتههای سادهای گفتم که میتونه کمک کنه به کسب و کارتون. ⏰ مدت ویدئو: ۱۳ دقیقه @CoffeeAndStartup
👍2
دوستانی که ویدئوی بازاریابی کم هزینه قسمت سوم رو دیده باشند، سایت quora.com رو معرفی کرده بودم به عنوان یکی از روشهای کم هزینه بازاریابی. گفتم هم سوال طرح کنید هم به سوالات جواب بدید و خودتون رو معرفی کنید از این طریق و نمونه ایرانیش رو نمیشناختم. آقای امامی برای سایت javabkoo.com رو فرستاد که نمونه ایرانی کوارا هستش. البته که فکر کنم ترافیک بالایی نداشته باشه ولی کاچی بعض هیچی. چک کنید شاید به دردتون خورد. تصوی…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crazyfounders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اینجا لایو بریم میبینید؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2023 to 12 March 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 965,937 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@crazyfounders named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Coffee & Startup” (@crazyfounders), 286 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crazyfounders.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.